Tools & Wizards About Us
lindaline.fi screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

lindaline.fi

Kiireim meretee Tallinnast Helsingisse - Linda Line Express

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

307 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

226 ms

lindaline.fi screenshot

About Website

Visit lindaline.fi now to see the best up-to-date Linda Line content for Finland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lindaline.fi

Kiireim meretee Tallinna ja Helsingi vahel. Tihedaim sõidugraafik - kuni 12 kiirlaeva väljumist päevas.

Visit lindaline.fi

Key Findings

We analyzed Lindaline.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 307 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lindaline.fi performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lindaline.fi

307 ms

style.css

101 ms

jquery.js

210 ms

qppr_frontend_script.js

344 ms

app-min.js

451 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lindaline.fi, 40% (6 requests) were made to Uploads.staticjw.com and 33% (5 requests) were made to Images.staticjw.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (485 ms) relates to the external source Images.staticjw.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

488.8 kB

After Optimization

441.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lindaline.fi main page is 488.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 418.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 14.5 kB
  • After minification 11.2 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 418.4 kB
  • After minification 383.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Linda Line images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 43.0 kB
  • After minification 43.0 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 98 B

  • Original 12.9 kB
  • After minification 12.9 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lindaline.fi has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linda Line. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lindaline.fi

www.lindaline.fi

307 ms

style.css

style.css

101 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

210 ms

qppr_frontend_script.js

qppr_frontend_script.js

344 ms

app-min.js

app-min.js

451 ms

www.lindaline.fi

www.lindaline.fi

181 ms

lainat-fi.jpg

lainat-fi.jpg

475 ms

lindaline_logo.png

lindaline_logo.png

252 ms

phone_icon-dark.png

phone_icon-dark.png

252 ms

smile-330x300.jpg

smile-330x300.jpg

473 ms

bicycle-330x300.png

bicycle-330x300.png

478 ms

laev-330x300.png

laev-330x300.png

485 ms

footer_logo.png

footer_logo.png

479 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

181 ms

track.js

track.js

179 ms

Accessibility Review

lindaline.fi accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

lindaline.fi best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lindaline.fi SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ET

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lindaline.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Estonian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lindaline.fi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lindaline.fi

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Linda Line. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: