4 sec in total
237 ms
3.4 sec
351 ms
Visit lipsiadesign.com now to see the best up-to-date LipsiaDESIGN content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lipsiadesign.com
No Trad. - LipsiaDESIGN
Visit lipsiadesign.comWe analyzed Lipsiadesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 237 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lipsiadesign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.817
4/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
237 ms
297 ms
375 ms
236 ms
327 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Lipsiadesign.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Store.lipsiasoft.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lipsiadesign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 639.1 kB (27%)
2.4 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Lipsiadesign.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LipsiaDESIGN images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 403.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 403.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 192.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lipsiadesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 192.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (53%)
57
27
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LipsiaDESIGN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lipsiadesign.com
237 ms
www.lipsiadesign.com
297 ms
en
375 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
236 ms
bootstrap.css
327 ms
base.css
224 ms
cart.css
264 ms
fancybox.css
216 ms
royalslider.css
263 ms
rs-default.css
423 ms
owl.carousel.css
430 ms
owl.theme.css
463 ms
font-awesome.css
8 ms
index.css
616 ms
jquery-1.11.js
858 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1018 ms
deparam.js
702 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
702 ms
bootstrap.min.js
814 ms
jquery.detectmobile.js
852 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1040 ms
velocity.min.js
1010 ms
transit.js
1045 ms
utilities.js
1046 ms
base.js
1057 ms
menu.js
1212 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
1474 ms
highlight.js
1269 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1344 ms
custom_text.js
1250 ms
css
77 ms
674493_Banner_Abbigliamento_Home.jpg
946 ms
674494_Banner_Bimbo-Pren_home.jpg
783 ms
674495_Banner_immagine_coo_home.jpg
788 ms
674491_Banner-Design.jpg
1000 ms
674492_658254_sun-4-xxl.png
373 ms
logo.png
807 ms
cart.png
877 ms
350x350_652105_solo_rebel.jpg
1380 ms
350x350_607668_eh_luca_2.jpg
1380 ms
350x350_605049_eh_luca.jpg
1379 ms
350x350_599001_marc.jpeg
1387 ms
350x350_478881_nutella_1.jpg
1378 ms
350x350_481113_ruspa.jpg
1379 ms
350x350_37228_cuore1.jpg
1533 ms
350x350_37227_cuore2.jpg
1504 ms
350x350_28165_dont_call_me_pc.jpg
1416 ms
350x350_26129_mela_skin_gadgetvivo-mangiatutto.jpg
1574 ms
350x350_26136_mela_skin_gadgetvivo-cuffie.jpg
1560 ms
350x350_26151_mela_skin_gadgetvivo_cuffie_bianco.jpg
1727 ms
350x350_26130_mela_skin_gadgetvivo-storiamela.jpg
1653 ms
350x350_26137_mela_skin_gadgetvivo-bruco.jpg
1808 ms
logo_white.png
1768 ms
widget_v2.135.js
16 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
111 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
134 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
152 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf
153 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
98 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM0DauxaEVho0aInXGvhmB4k.ttf
151 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Iue0YgdIF4L_q7PS4yTQOQ.ttf
150 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Edtd7Dq2ZflsctMEexj2lw.ttf
151 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6DiS5Fc5Bg1xsygf01vWWOU.ttf
152 ms
__$$__stringtable_lang_it.js
42 ms
analytics.js
53 ms
grab.png
894 ms
preloader-white.gif
892 ms
collect
12 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
93 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
4 ms
nr-892.min.js
42 ms
lipsiadesign.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lipsiadesign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
lipsiadesign.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lipsiadesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lipsiadesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lipsiadesign.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LipsiaDESIGN. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: