4.9 sec in total
339 ms
3.4 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to litec-computer.de homepage info - get ready to check Litec Computer best content right away, or after learning these important things about litec-computer.de
IT-Systemhaus, Cloud Service, Handwerkersoftware, Topkontor Handwerk und Zeiterfassung, die Cloud für Kleinbetriebe, Mittelstand und Existenzgründer.
Visit litec-computer.deWe analyzed Litec-computer.de page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
litec-computer.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value5.5 s
18/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value6,450 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
339 ms
364 ms
811 ms
427 ms
332 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Litec-computer.de, 49% (33 requests) were made to Handytarifevergleich.de and 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (977 ms) relates to the external source Handytarifevergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 465.2 kB (56%)
826.9 kB
361.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Litec-computer.de main page is 826.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 314.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litec Computer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 187.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.0 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litec-computer.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (63%)
57
21
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litec Computer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litec-computer.de
339 ms
www.computerchannel.de
364 ms
www.handytarifevergleich.de
811 ms
b0c8375f0a1e88bcb807dc405c74b4e3.css
427 ms
94337dc62baaf3b44c3280010c70ca3d.css
332 ms
216dd8a121c46746496717b789f21a00.css
332 ms
89b3ae678fa1b16ca7b2b37431903e0e.css
333 ms
95385a763a23e8b56ed064f87e38049e.css
335 ms
e423e513f423aec6b77d2a176654f0a6.css
451 ms
f56d1b7f1f82127c20ed42a5e15627fc.css
445 ms
f9489edb8cdd4e677ce8f697f133accc.css
447 ms
458aebecc49e5fe69c06cd217e976dd0.css
449 ms
a71348610e7b09e81995984b723e1340.js
781 ms
7eb234e3a21bd0e1357a65be2bb30f15.js
531 ms
css
58 ms
jsapi
36 ms
txhandytarifrechner.php
548 ms
691f753c6d08d27d05841db0191471cb.js
335 ms
9baca1017b079e6310713e8d6bdfbca8.js
334 ms
c2a95ef5c72a3a652077eb692f69d00d.js
338 ms
3246816cf9e2037ca248370fd738530a.js
341 ms
8a0e78a889083df785186d0235eff306.js
420 ms
21e027da90b19514e18c595d74709430.js
446 ms
cd5524d27ab88a3150a3b306ea27f60f.js
446 ms
2cd8e88db6b8f10aa28b063ed0805438.js
450 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
191 ms
ga.js
75 ms
prum.min.js
174 ms
gray_jean.png
166 ms
handytarifevergleich-logo.png
165 ms
social-sprites.png
165 ms
txhandytarifrechnerstyle.min.css
149 ms
t_netz.png
200 ms
analytics.js
150 ms
uid-285.css
334 ms
qxqBOmIg-1Y
201 ms
v_netz.png
183 ms
o_netz.png
182 ms
e_netz.png
182 ms
handytarife-vergleich-300x200.jpg
137 ms
handy-tarifvergleich-300x200.jpg
136 ms
handynutzung-300x200.jpg
332 ms
neues-smartphone-aus-vergleich-300x177.jpg
332 ms
lte-geschwindigkeit-300x200.jpg
356 ms
allnet-flat-vergleich-300x196.jpg
353 ms
prepaid-vergleich-300x199.jpg
397 ms
handyauswahl-300x200.jpg
329 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
148 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
157 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
173 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
172 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
182 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
977 ms
__utm.gif
50 ms
collect
23 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
20 ms
www-embed-player.js
34 ms
base.js
57 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
31 ms
ad_status.js
77 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
46 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
46 ms
46 ms
ui+en.css
19 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,corechart+en.I.js
31 ms
2714.png
419 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
62 ms
txhandytarifrechnerscript.min.js
108 ms
litec-computer.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
litec-computer.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
litec-computer.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litec-computer.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litec-computer.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litec-computer.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Litec Computer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: