10.2 sec in total
2 sec
7.6 sec
682 ms
Click here to check amazing Lite Impact content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about liteimpact.com
Visit liteimpact.comWe analyzed Liteimpact.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
liteimpact.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.844
4/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
1958 ms
60 ms
254 ms
268 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Liteimpact.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Liteimpact.com.
Page size can be reduced by 504.0 kB (44%)
1.1 MB
636.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Liteimpact.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 494.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lite Impact images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 250.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 250.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 203.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liteimpact.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (52%)
60
29
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lite Impact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.liteimpact.com
1958 ms
webfont.js
60 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
254 ms
styles.css
268 ms
style.css
231 ms
bootstrap.css
340 ms
font-awesome.min.css
254 ms
Pixelvicon.css
264 ms
animate.css
328 ms
owl.carousel.css
331 ms
magnific-popup.css
330 ms
style.css
346 ms
css
32 ms
jquery.js
480 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
417 ms
itro-scripts.js
468 ms
jquery.form.min.js
436 ms
scripts.js
441 ms
jquery.appear.js
453 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
564 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.js
564 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
571 ms
jquery.owl.carousel.min.js
580 ms
jquery.nav.js
574 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
572 ms
jquery.countTo.js
582 ms
jquery.pin.js
675 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
647 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
647 ms
js
32 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
647 ms
comment-reply.min.js
664 ms
custom.js
647 ms
wp-embed.min.js
799 ms
preloader.gif
226 ms
bg3.jpg
662 ms
white-logo-e1417774883146.png
242 ms
www.liteimpact.com
1678 ms
parallax.gif
747 ms
x.png
440 ms
image.gif
441 ms
Team1-e1430962523127-263x340.jpg
442 ms
Team2-263x340.jpg
493 ms
team3-263x340.jpg
515 ms
11149555_10153244313939824_1382543101549474251_n-e1443783075156-263x340.jpg
590 ms
process1.jpg
592 ms
process2.jpg
599 ms
process3.jpg
1692 ms
process4.jpg
1694 ms
client7.jpg
1689 ms
client2-190x53.png
1692 ms
client6.jpg
1664 ms
client3.png
2115 ms
client4-190x75.jpg
2103 ms
client5-190x60.jpg
2115 ms
client8.png
2063 ms
logo-footer.png
2149 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
21 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
33 ms
ZCcPJiCGOzh84o2siPk48Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
59 ms
5xAt7XK2vkUdjhGtt98uneLrC4Du4e_yfTJ8Ol60xk0.ttf
59 ms
pixelvicon.woff
2188 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2336 ms
1558635906.png
2220 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1849 ms
liteimpact.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
liteimpact.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
liteimpact.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liteimpact.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liteimpact.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liteimpact.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lite Impact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: