3.9 sec in total
253 ms
2.8 sec
836 ms
Click here to check amazing Literary Terms content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about literaryterms.net
Literary terms refer to the technique, style, and formatting used by writers and speakers to masterfully emphasize, embellish, or strengthen their compositions
Visit literaryterms.netWe analyzed Literaryterms.net page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
literaryterms.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value6.5 s
38/100
10%
Value5,410 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.8 s
2/100
10%
253 ms
28 ms
138 ms
127 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Literaryterms.net, 18% (21 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (948 ms) belongs to the original domain Literaryterms.net.
Page size can be reduced by 130.6 kB (50%)
260.1 kB
129.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Literaryterms.net main page is 260.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 112.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Literary Terms images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (80%)
108
22
The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Literary Terms. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
literaryterms.net
253 ms
css
28 ms
style.css
138 ms
style.css
127 ms
cat-posts.css
130 ms
morph.css
164 ms
tabsy.css
131 ms
font-awesome.min.css
167 ms
styles.css
197 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.min.css
196 ms
essb-mobile.min.css
948 ms
style-responsive.css
194 ms
boxed-1120.css
209 ms
style-advanced.css
244 ms
custom.css
252 ms
jquery.js
271 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
262 ms
morph-accordion.js
273 ms
plusone.js
39 ms
all.js
8 ms
lyte-min.js
266 ms
plugin.css
254 ms
core.min.js
276 ms
widget.min.js
285 ms
tabs.min.js
285 ms
morph.js
311 ms
search.js
338 ms
jquery.tabsy.js
343 ms
wptabsy.js
349 ms
comment-reply.min.js
349 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
368 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
432 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
422 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
409 ms
jquery.theme.js
418 ms
wp-embed.min.js
421 ms
essb-mailform.min.css
476 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.min.css
487 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.min.css
494 ms
essb-mailform.js
488 ms
scroll_tracker.js
446 ms
sticky.js
484 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
471 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
search.png
107 ms
sprite-h.png
106 ms
sidebar-left.png
107 ms
gplus.png
103 ms
facebook.png
105 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
63 ms
League_Gothic-webfont.woff
220 ms
linkid.js
58 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
137 ms
icons-14.png
97 ms
hr-light.png
94 ms
footer-to-top.png
94 ms
networks21.png
96 ms
collect
31 ms
collect
93 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
25 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
css
84 ms
245 ms
xd_arbiter.php
52 ms
xd_arbiter.php
119 ms
css
22 ms
networks21.png
368 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.min.js
359 ms
essb-mobile.min.js
357 ms
g-01.png
354 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
15 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
41 ms
comments
648 ms
comments.php
184 ms
fql
154 ms
count.json
84 ms
get-noapi-counts.php
619 ms
admin-ajax.php
630 ms
postmessageRelay
73 ms
rs=AGLTcCMQHHiZH-F-Q8EPKomn4wYTnxyThg
17 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
16 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
29 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
33 ms
yBwS6rJyogl.css
39 ms
ZeuPykSxSED.css
50 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
80 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
46 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
40 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
143 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
67 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
44 ms
FyxLoiww5bU.js
142 ms
HaMjR2eXz4B.js
192 ms
WN2wSsLOuKy.js
198 ms
Kt4tkgSRvHH.js
196 ms
Q4A0UyjU8W2.js
212 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
211 ms
fav.png
33 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
23 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
19 ms
uFp_tsTJboUY7kue5XAsGA=s46
48 ms
photo.jpg
93 ms
eR-qA8bp1RM.js
23 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
22 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
23 ms
fountain-72d8bab6fd088426374a15d7477489a4.png
17 ms
stream_showroom-d8de88384f6e5817983d0fcec12c128a.png
36 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
48 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
59 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
62 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
18 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
68 ms
lazyload.1.0.4.min.js
70 ms
hqdefault.jpg
20 ms
lytesprite.png
69 ms
literaryterms.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
literaryterms.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
literaryterms.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Literaryterms.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Literaryterms.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
literaryterms.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Literary Terms. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: