Tools & Wizards About Us
literaryterms.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

literaryterms.net

Literary Terms: Definition and Examples of Literary Terms

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

253 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

836 ms

literaryterms.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Literary Terms content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about literaryterms.net

Literary terms refer to the technique, style, and formatting used by writers and speakers to masterfully emphasize, embellish, or strengthen their compositions

Visit literaryterms.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Literaryterms.net page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

literaryterms.net performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,410 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

literaryterms.net

253 ms

css

28 ms

style.css

138 ms

style.css

127 ms

cat-posts.css

130 ms

Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Literaryterms.net, 18% (21 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (948 ms) belongs to the original domain Literaryterms.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 130.6 kB (50%)

Content Size

260.1 kB

After Optimization

129.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Literaryterms.net main page is 260.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 112.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 89.8 kB

  • Original 112.9 kB
  • After minification 112.5 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 82.9 kB
  • After minification 80.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Literary Terms images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 64.3 kB
  • After minification 64.3 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (80%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Literary Terms. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

literaryterms.net

literaryterms.net

253 ms

css

css

28 ms

style.css

style.css

138 ms

style.css

style.css

127 ms

cat-posts.css

cat-posts.css

130 ms

morph.css

morph.css

164 ms

tabsy.css

tabsy.css

131 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

167 ms

styles.css

styles.css

197 ms

easy-social-share-buttons.min.css

easy-social-share-buttons.min.css

196 ms

essb-mobile.min.css

essb-mobile.min.css

948 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

194 ms

boxed-1120.css

boxed-1120.css

209 ms

style-advanced.css

style-advanced.css

244 ms

custom.css

custom.css

252 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

271 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

262 ms

morph-accordion.js

morph-accordion.js

273 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

39 ms

all.js

all.js

8 ms

lyte-min.js

lyte-min.js

266 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

254 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

276 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

285 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

285 ms

morph.js

morph.js

311 ms

search.js

search.js

338 ms

jquery.tabsy.js

jquery.tabsy.js

343 ms

wptabsy.js

wptabsy.js

349 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

349 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

368 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

432 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

422 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

409 ms

jquery.theme.js

jquery.theme.js

418 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

421 ms

essb-mailform.min.css

essb-mailform.min.css

476 ms

easy-social-share-buttons.min.css

easy-social-share-buttons.min.css

487 ms

easy-social-share-buttons.min.css

easy-social-share-buttons.min.css

494 ms

essb-mailform.js

essb-mailform.js

488 ms

scroll_tracker.js

scroll_tracker.js

446 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

484 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

471 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

47 ms

search.png

search.png

107 ms

sprite-h.png

sprite-h.png

106 ms

sidebar-left.png

sidebar-left.png

107 ms

gplus.png

gplus.png

103 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

105 ms

QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf

QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf

63 ms

League_Gothic-webfont.woff

League_Gothic-webfont.woff

220 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

58 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

137 ms

icons-14.png

icons-14.png

97 ms

hr-light.png

hr-light.png

94 ms

footer-to-top.png

footer-to-top.png

94 ms

networks21.png

networks21.png

96 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

collect

collect

93 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

25 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

25 ms

css

css

84 ms

245 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

52 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

119 ms

css

css

22 ms

networks21.png

networks21.png

368 ms

easy-social-share-buttons.min.js

easy-social-share-buttons.min.js

359 ms

essb-mobile.min.js

essb-mobile.min.js

357 ms

g-01.png

g-01.png

354 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

15 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_2

cb=gapi.loaded_2

41 ms

comments

comments

648 ms

comments.php

comments.php

184 ms

fql

fql

154 ms

count.json

count.json

84 ms

get-noapi-counts.php

get-noapi-counts.php

619 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

630 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

73 ms

rs=AGLTcCMQHHiZH-F-Q8EPKomn4wYTnxyThg

rs=AGLTcCMQHHiZH-F-Q8EPKomn4wYTnxyThg

17 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

16 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

32 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

kyEKgjk51ZE.css

kyEKgjk51ZE.css

29 ms

xgj7bXhJNEH.css

xgj7bXhJNEH.css

33 ms

yBwS6rJyogl.css

yBwS6rJyogl.css

39 ms

ZeuPykSxSED.css

ZeuPykSxSED.css

50 ms

q68gy-v_YMF.js

q68gy-v_YMF.js

80 ms

FJmpeSpHpjS.js

FJmpeSpHpjS.js

46 ms

0wM5s1Khldu.js

0wM5s1Khldu.js

40 ms

LTv6ZK-5zxz.js

LTv6ZK-5zxz.js

143 ms

1FCa-btixu2.js

1FCa-btixu2.js

67 ms

Oagsvfb4VWi.js

Oagsvfb4VWi.js

44 ms

FyxLoiww5bU.js

FyxLoiww5bU.js

142 ms

HaMjR2eXz4B.js

HaMjR2eXz4B.js

192 ms

WN2wSsLOuKy.js

WN2wSsLOuKy.js

198 ms

Kt4tkgSRvHH.js

Kt4tkgSRvHH.js

196 ms

Q4A0UyjU8W2.js

Q4A0UyjU8W2.js

212 ms

1bNoFZUdlYZ.js

1bNoFZUdlYZ.js

211 ms

fav.png

fav.png

33 ms

wL6VQj7Ab77.png

wL6VQj7Ab77.png

23 ms

K00K-UgnsKu.png

K00K-UgnsKu.png

19 ms

uFp_tsTJboUY7kue5XAsGA=s46

uFp_tsTJboUY7kue5XAsGA=s46

48 ms

photo.jpg

photo.jpg

93 ms

eR-qA8bp1RM.js

eR-qA8bp1RM.js

23 ms

I6-MnjEovm5.js

I6-MnjEovm5.js

22 ms

pQrUxxo5oQp.js

pQrUxxo5oQp.js

23 ms

fountain-72d8bab6fd088426374a15d7477489a4.png

fountain-72d8bab6fd088426374a15d7477489a4.png

17 ms

stream_showroom-d8de88384f6e5817983d0fcec12c128a.png

stream_showroom-d8de88384f6e5817983d0fcec12c128a.png

36 ms

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

48 ms

dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf

dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf

59 ms

bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf

bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf

62 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

18 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

68 ms

lazyload.1.0.4.min.js

lazyload.1.0.4.min.js

70 ms

hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

20 ms

lytesprite.png

lytesprite.png

69 ms

Accessibility Review

literaryterms.net accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

literaryterms.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

literaryterms.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Literaryterms.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Literaryterms.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

literaryterms.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Literary Terms. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: