10.7 sec in total
451 ms
8.5 sec
1.7 sec
Welcome to liton.ru homepage info - get ready to check Liton best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about liton.ru
Производство упаковки для молочных продуктов и полимерной упаковки с 2000 года: банки, крышки, плёнки, стаканы, платинки. Заказать молочную упаковку от производителя Литон.
Visit liton.ruWe analyzed Liton.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 451 ms and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
liton.ru performance score
451 ms
133 ms
279 ms
283 ms
277 ms
Our browser made a total of 144 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Liton.ru, 11% (16 requests) were made to Khm0.googleapis.com and 8% (12 requests) were made to Khm1.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Liton.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 573.2 kB (10%)
5.5 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Liton.ru main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liton images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 436.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 436.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liton.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (40%)
136
82
The browser has sent 136 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
451 ms
reset.css
133 ms
stylesheet.css
279 ms
typography.css
283 ms
layout.css
277 ms
jquery.booklet.latest.css
283 ms
flip.css
282 ms
common.css
437 ms
lavamenu.css
423 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
426 ms
video-js.css
426 ms
first-slider.css
424 ms
forms.css
438 ms
dict.css
572 ms
menu.css
576 ms
adaptive-menu.css
574 ms
video.css
575 ms
common.css
582 ms
socio-thread.css
583 ms
lang.css
732 ms
relation-form.css
734 ms
awwwards.css
732 ms
cssawards.css
732 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
924 ms
js
65 ms
jquery.lavamenu.js
737 ms
jquery.pin.js
909 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.1.custom.min.js
1178 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
917 ms
jquery.booklet.latest.min.js
915 ms
jquery.scope.js
914 ms
flip.js
1030 ms
jquery.easing.js
1035 ms
jquery.tools.js
1042 ms
common.js
1036 ms
gmap.ru.js
1040 ms
share.js
324 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
1194 ms
video.js
1229 ms
jquery.form.js
965 ms
relationship.js
1105 ms
captcha.ru.js
955 ms
captcha.js
1075 ms
my.video.js
1074 ms
common.js
1096 ms
main.js
979 ms
bg.png
146 ms
70.png
276 ms
logo.jpg
154 ms
menu-icons.png
156 ms
menu-separator.png
152 ms
dirty.png
713 ms
main-img-back.jpg
274 ms
screen.png
3243 ms
el1.png
276 ms
el2.png
278 ms
preview.jpg
961 ms
notebook.png
2820 ms
1ee25441a6ea8513e13cfbe367d841ac.png
404 ms
watch.js
24 ms
catalog-back.png
356 ms
borders.png
544 ms
140_4b4658ed21fe8316fbca641d344dba92.png
1222 ms
100_edfa0e4ccb4bc50f7bb1d3220c29464b.png
1954 ms
22_60901cdade3442b9bc4511a625a79b92.png
1391 ms
144_dc79eaa734aa00e7ba28512463c4ecbb.png
1171 ms
145_e66382c22837c290afc943ab2b6300d5.png
1689 ms
75_5d34b03275c8899743806a34e092d7de.png
1562 ms
76_deba6c0429e5701e11d6d1f7cd5b8698.png
1734 ms
arrow-l.png
1724 ms
arrow-r.png
1886 ms
str.png
1950 ms
stitch-top.png
1955 ms
stitch-bottom.png
2040 ms
stitch-info.png
2297 ms
numbers.png
2125 ms
transporter.png
2293 ms
kirov-point.png
2239 ms
intro-webfont.woff
2282 ms
socio.png
2416 ms
trobber.gif
2438 ms
3028 ms
footer-bg.png
2505 ms
menu-active.png
2505 ms
140_4b4658ed21fe8316fbca641d344dba92.png
549 ms
100_edfa0e4ccb4bc50f7bb1d3220c29464b.png
985 ms
22_60901cdade3442b9bc4511a625a79b92.png
934 ms
144_dc79eaa734aa00e7ba28512463c4ecbb.png
1297 ms
145_e66382c22837c290afc943ab2b6300d5.png
408 ms
75_5d34b03275c8899743806a34e092d7de.png
441 ms
76_deba6c0429e5701e11d6d1f7cd5b8698.png
722 ms
slider-bg.png
617 ms
common.js
132 ms
map.js
122 ms
util.js
275 ms
marker.js
215 ms
infowindow.js
213 ms
stats.js
142 ms
onion.js
117 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
237 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
199 ms
kh
196 ms
kh
195 ms
controls.js
172 ms
kh
176 ms
kh
331 ms
kh
360 ms
kh
362 ms
kh
359 ms
kh
339 ms
kh
349 ms
kh
430 ms
kh
437 ms
kh
437 ms
kh
895 ms
kh
174 ms
kh
337 ms
kh
320 ms
kh
425 ms
kh
351 ms
kh
326 ms
kh
331 ms
kh
335 ms
kh
426 ms
kh
428 ms
kh
515 ms
kh
420 ms
kh
658 ms
kh
509 ms
kh
515 ms
transparent.png
149 ms
css
238 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
464 ms
mapcnt6.png
167 ms
google_white5.png
78 ms
marker.png
185 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
146 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
187 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
475 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
399 ms
sv5.png
56 ms
tmapctrl.png
59 ms
cb_scout5.png
148 ms
tmapctrl4.png
88 ms
liton.ru SEO score
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liton.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liton.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liton.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: