3.7 sec in total
270 ms
2.9 sec
602 ms
Visit live-in.care now to see the best up-to-date Live In content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about live-in.care
Live In Care: Helping you remain independent at home with a bespoke 1-2-1 live in care package to live the life you choose.
Visit live-in.careWe analyzed Live-in.care page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
live-in.care performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value1,050 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.675
8/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
270 ms
180 ms
369 ms
28 ms
247 ms
Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Live-in.care, 42% (50 requests) were made to Livein.care and 6% (7 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Livein.care.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (44%)
2.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Live-in.care main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 231.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 231.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Live In images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 857.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 857.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Live-in.care needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (65%)
100
35
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live In. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
live-in.care
270 ms
livein.care
180 ms
livein.care
369 ms
shareaholic.js
28 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
247 ms
1455784208index.css
240 ms
1455784208index.js
397 ms
tp.widget.sync.bootstrap.min.js
33 ms
1448443217index.css
333 ms
bootstrap.min.js
249 ms
selectivizr-min.js
250 ms
plugins.js
331 ms
hoverIntent.js
331 ms
superfish.js
332 ms
core.min.js
332 ms
widget.min.js
471 ms
mouse.min.js
469 ms
slider.min.js
471 ms
jquery.plugins.min.js
472 ms
wppepvn_libs.min.js
473 ms
frontend.min.js
511 ms
jquery.form.min.js
557 ms
scripts.js
557 ms
shiftnav.min.js
559 ms
wp-embed.min.js
560 ms
4ebeceb4a090c0f88b8e8d43f13a60bb.json
77 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
linkid.js
9 ms
collect
4 ms
collect
63 ms
ga-audiences
105 ms
atrk.js
100 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
58 ms
logo.jpg
379 ms
home.png
548 ms
cornwall.jpg
547 ms
devon.jpg
547 ms
dorset.jpg
546 ms
gibralter.png
594 ms
glous.jpg
665 ms
hamp.jpg
805 ms
sthellier.jpg
635 ms
oxford.jpg
762 ms
somer.jpg
762 ms
midlands.jpg
917 ms
wilts.jpg
884 ms
skype.jpg
769 ms
facebook.jpg
839 ms
twitter.jpg
884 ms
yelp.png
885 ms
7083971_41x25.png
897 ms
7083968_25x24.png
916 ms
7083969_45x26.png
996 ms
Paperi-e1435313374394.jpg
996 ms
delicious-e1435503848581.png
996 ms
stumbleupon-logo-e1435504821187.png
1002 ms
Google-.jpg
1017 ms
7083970_45x24.png
1015 ms
collect
53 ms
sdk.js
567 ms
8788737_98x42.jpg
1025 ms
6790507_89x44.jpg
1022 ms
shrMain.min.js
42 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
330 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
331 ms
atrk.gif
110 ms
jquery.min.js
122 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
775 ms
pageview.gif
56 ms
app.js
41 ms
vglnk.js
72 ms
partners.js
84 ms
247 ms
xd_arbiter.php
353 ms
angular.min.js
23 ms
pixel.gif
30 ms
pixel.gif
8 ms
sholic.js
120 ms
usermatch
325 ms
beacon.js
122 ms
cms-sh2c.html
232 ms
sharing-caring.png
48 ms
shareaholic-icons.woff
36 ms
eexelate.js
20 ms
38 ms
ep
50 ms
ep
27 ms
pixel
71 ms
ping_match.gif
84 ms
pixel
48 ms
145 ms
2964
97 ms
cm
57 ms
usermatch
177 ms
epx.gif
19 ms
rs
47 ms
pixel
42 ms
net.php
13 ms
match-result
14 ms
generic
81 ms
Vu2Dj8AoJZYAARURtqcAAADI%26971
197 ms
gr
129 ms
i.gif
179 ms
casale
82 ms
ping
173 ms
crum
187 ms
check
7 ms
pixel.gif
108 ms
cfcm.ashx
20 ms
rum
245 ms
crum
219 ms
pixel.gif
106 ms
xrefid.xgi
44 ms
m
71 ms
rum
154 ms
rum
206 ms
domains
57 ms
crum
167 ms
xrefid.xgi
7 ms
live-in.care accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
live-in.care best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
live-in.care SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Live-in.care can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Live-in.care main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
live-in.care
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Live In. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: