12.6 sec in total
3 sec
9.1 sec
490 ms
Click here to check amazing Living Tomorrow content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livingtomorrow.nl
Living Tomorrow is an innovation ecosystem with more than 80 partners, here you can discover the future.
Visit livingtomorrow.nlWe analyzed Livingtomorrow.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
livingtomorrow.nl performance score
3039 ms
428 ms
290 ms
281 ms
283 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Livingtomorrow.nl, 7% (7 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Livingtomorrow.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (53%)
2.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Livingtomorrow.nl main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 238.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 238.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Living Tomorrow images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 953.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 953.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 111.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livingtomorrow.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (69%)
90
28
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Living Tomorrow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.livingtomorrow.nl
3039 ms
style.css
428 ms
styles.css
290 ms
frontend.css
281 ms
templates.css
283 ms
pagenavi-css.css
284 ms
default.min.css
292 ms
wppa-style.css
452 ms
jquery.js
687 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
376 ms
jquery.form.min.js
481 ms
wppa.min.js
393 ms
wppa-slideshow.min.js
592 ms
wppa-ajax-front.min.js
493 ms
wppa-popup.min.js
521 ms
wppa-touch.min.js
534 ms
wppa-init.nl.js
578 ms
external-tracking.min.js
517 ms
output.css
573 ms
scripts.js
556 ms
core.min.js
637 ms
widget.min.js
633 ms
accordion.min.js
636 ms
tabs.min.js
659 ms
fanwood.js
663 ms
fanwood-ui.js
713 ms
addthis_widget.js
15 ms
shareaholic.js
20 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
385 ms
fc2d3eb75dc42a25cfe5d87d3c0b28bf.json
89 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
living.jpg
921 ms
bg-main.jpg
472 ms
bg-header.png
241 ms
bg-nav-item-secondary.png
130 ms
shadow-curve.png
129 ms
Olijfboom-240x240.jpg
316 ms
icon-clock.png
241 ms
icon-comment-bubble.png
239 ms
kleurrijke-slaapkamer-240x240.png
829 ms
white-wash-verven-240x240.jpg
452 ms
Chinese-bruidskast-240x240.jpg
538 ms
rechthoekige-tuin-240x240.jpg
537 ms
cv-ktel-240x240.jpg
658 ms
eyecatcher-240x240.jpg
601 ms
Dakpannen-240x240.jpg
747 ms
disney-prinsessenbed-240x240.jpg
696 ms
marine-en-wit-kleuren-slaapkamer-240x240.jpg
732 ms
arrow-right.png
762 ms
loading.gif
821 ms
shrMain.min.js
30 ms
chunk-webfont.woff
835 ms
collect
41 ms
jquery.min.js
41 ms
pageview.gif
18 ms
vglnk.js
8 ms
partners.js
91 ms
pixel.gif
23 ms
pixel.gif
21 ms
sholic.js
10 ms
usermatch
44 ms
beacon.js
9 ms
cms-sh2c.html
71 ms
eexelate.js
15 ms
17 ms
ep
11 ms
ep
16 ms
usermatch
24 ms
pixel
28 ms
57 ms
Vu5nQsAoJZYAAMKPBusAAABt%26971
126 ms
casale
87 ms
130 ms
i.gif
139 ms
pixelssl.htm
141 ms
cs
112 ms
ping_match.gif
54 ms
net.php
31 ms
2964
44 ms
generic
10 ms
rum
57 ms
rum
53 ms
crum
49 ms
pixel
28 ms
pixel
34 ms
crum
36 ms
crum
28 ms
ermcm
26 ms
match-result
68 ms
pixel.gif
32 ms
pixel.gif
30 ms
xrefid.xgi
17 ms
crum
27 ms
ddcssl.htm
38 ms
rs
7 ms
crum
24 ms
xrefid.xgi
6 ms
ping
16 ms
domains
44 ms
300lo.json
30 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
25 ms
livingtomorrow.nl SEO score
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livingtomorrow.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livingtomorrow.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livingtomorrow.nl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Living Tomorrow. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: