Tools & Wizards About Us
londoncalligraphy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

londoncalligraphy.com

London Calligraphy - 5* Calligraphy Courses & Services in London

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

517 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

530 ms

londoncalligraphy.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing London Calligraphy content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about londoncalligraphy.com

Learn Calligraphy in London at our 5* rated calligraphy courses. Taught by the UK's leading Calligrapher. Clients include Royalty and Chanel.

Visit londoncalligraphy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Londoncalligraphy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 517 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

londoncalligraphy.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.117

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

londoncalligraphy.com

517 ms

fnsaw.css

527 ms

fnsaw.css

267 ms

fnsav.css

631 ms

css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Londoncalligraphy.com, 17% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (9 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Londoncalligraphy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 147.2 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Londoncalligraphy.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 681.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 137.4 kB

  • Original 155.0 kB
  • After minification 146.2 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 681.8 kB
  • After minification 673.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. London Calligraphy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 920 B

  • Original 281.6 kB
  • After minification 281.6 kB
  • After compression 280.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 272 B

  • Original 206.6 kB
  • After minification 206.6 kB
  • After compression 206.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Londoncalligraphy.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (58%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of London Calligraphy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

londoncalligraphy.com

londoncalligraphy.com

517 ms

fnsaw.css

fnsaw.css

527 ms

fnsaw.css

fnsaw.css

267 ms

fnsav.css

fnsav.css

631 ms

css

css

31 ms

fnsaw.js

fnsaw.js

463 ms

fnsaw.js

fnsaw.js

279 ms

4o7vu.css

4o7vu.css

284 ms

js

js

57 ms

fnsav.css

fnsav.css

270 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

470 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

291 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

360 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

385 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

466 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

469 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

477 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

527 ms

mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js

mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js

537 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

1015 ms

common.js

common.js

727 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

728 ms

loader.js

loader.js

29 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

729 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

730 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

730 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

737 ms

index.js

index.js

834 ms

forms.js

forms.js

737 ms

ACg8ocLUTP0-ASJ2z0qtD2fMPxC8aQqJYsPcLF1xq0UeLxo=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocLUTP0-ASJ2z0qtD2fMPxC8aQqJYsPcLF1xq0UeLxo=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

221 ms

Layer-29-large2.jpg

Layer-29-large2.jpg

890 ms

Layer-22.jpg

Layer-22.jpg

571 ms

Layer-48.jpg

Layer-48.jpg

360 ms

London-Calligraphy-Events.jpg

London-Calligraphy-Events.jpg

570 ms

ACg8ocK_iXZVFedgBjm63C9qVaScFrvCPWPjgmn8c32wlQkX=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocK_iXZVFedgBjm63C9qVaScFrvCPWPjgmn8c32wlQkX=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

362 ms

ALV-UjX1ERKfJVHS91jqvjTbKK-N4o_HC69GDBNIA40GAotcdw=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ALV-UjX1ERKfJVHS91jqvjTbKK-N4o_HC69GDBNIA40GAotcdw=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

503 ms

ACg8ocKueU3gVJ2UXfITu-xWMrYC_gKqcHLqXJWj6T4tkKhx=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocKueU3gVJ2UXfITu-xWMrYC_gKqcHLqXJWj6T4tkKhx=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

275 ms

ACg8ocIEC3HAiuUyTFZwoQKwav6d34au1Nmqn2iYOyCrLsgP=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocIEC3HAiuUyTFZwoQKwav6d34au1Nmqn2iYOyCrLsgP=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

569 ms

ACg8ocLSVTblU5coWJ342ukwYvNGi9pJAMaLMGeP_DZd_Zrw=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocLSVTblU5coWJ342ukwYvNGi9pJAMaLMGeP_DZd_Zrw=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

275 ms

ACg8ocI4YNmBxKF7xapXIU-YnPUWQivhH7_hg8TbK1wJ-xjh=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocI4YNmBxKF7xapXIU-YnPUWQivhH7_hg8TbK1wJ-xjh=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

364 ms

ACg8ocLHll_IfTmnP-_7LEcZ89chZpLIVjcAkU06i-0spYcG=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocLHll_IfTmnP-_7LEcZ89chZpLIVjcAkU06i-0spYcG=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

500 ms

ALV-UjUlNCUrwNbEK7SK4Y9DuD-2FuMnbCHk7uzQwIbxAOkAMA=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ALV-UjUlNCUrwNbEK7SK4Y9DuD-2FuMnbCHk7uzQwIbxAOkAMA=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

365 ms

wlp_gwjKBV1pqhv23IQ.ttf

wlp_gwjKBV1pqhv23IQ.ttf

132 ms

wlpygwjKBV1pqhND-ZQY-WY.ttf

wlpygwjKBV1pqhND-ZQY-WY.ttf

170 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

568 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf

275 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

276 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

416 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

280 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf

281 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf

278 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

277 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf

278 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf

281 ms

022a0a4ae591496344971b75f.js

022a0a4ae591496344971b75f.js

395 ms

f.svg

f.svg

85 ms

icon.svg

icon.svg

89 ms

js

js

101 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

92 ms

collect

collect

249 ms

Logo-text-only-small.png

Logo-text-only-small.png

124 ms

collect

collect

97 ms

London-Calligraphy-Fashion-Illustration-Placecards.jpg

London-Calligraphy-Fashion-Illustration-Placecards.jpg

179 ms

London-Calligraphy-Workshop1-1.jpg

London-Calligraphy-Workshop1-1.jpg

273 ms

fnsaw.css

fnsaw.css

91 ms

Accessibility Review

londoncalligraphy.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

londoncalligraphy.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

londoncalligraphy.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Londoncalligraphy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Londoncalligraphy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

londoncalligraphy.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of London Calligraphy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: