Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

532 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

908 ms

lonelylabel.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lonelylabel.com homepage info - get ready to check Lonely Label best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lonelylabel.com

Visit lonelylabel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lonelylabel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 532 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lonelylabel.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,790 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lonelylabel.com

532 ms

production-5da2f61c3ba3f5e21cd23273bee2341d7c5df94e849affc4ddb6e90e2b1132a8.css

11 ms

modernizr.min.js

62 ms

javascript.gp

184 ms

frontend_plugins-475553590156131a1e093126e2e42624b0af981734961e16c063e91c9ecfebcf.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Lonelylabel.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to Secure.livechatinc.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (590 ms) relates to the external source Scontent.cdninstagram.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (20%)

Content Size

6.2 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Lonelylabel.com main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 4.5 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lonely Label images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 811.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 342.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 811.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 396.3 kB

  • Original 496.9 kB
  • After minification 496.3 kB
  • After compression 100.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lonelylabel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 396.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (36%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lonely Label. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lonelylabel.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

lonelylabel.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lonelylabel.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lonelylabel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lonelylabel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lonely Label. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: