5.3 sec in total
619 ms
4.5 sec
247 ms
Welcome to lookp.com homepage info - get ready to check LookP best content for Malaysia right away, or after learning these important things about lookp.com
Read the review and rating of all kind of Professional in your area, such as dentist, skin specialist, personal trainer, home tutor and more!
Visit lookp.comWe analyzed Lookp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 619 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lookp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value4.0 s
48/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value2,240 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.215
58/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
619 ms
716 ms
515 ms
77 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Lookp.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lookp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (67%)
1.9 MB
637.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Lookp.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 864.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LookP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 536.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 536.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 718.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lookp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 718.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (79%)
38
8
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LookP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lookp.com
619 ms
www.lookp.com
716 ms
jquery.js
515 ms
jquery.min.js
77 ms
select2.min.js
71 ms
select2.css
144 ms
bootstrap.min.css
121 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
141 ms
3393390433.js
977 ms
default_plug.min.js
509 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
544 ms
twitter.bootstrap.min.js
545 ms
bootstrap-tagsinput.min.js
548 ms
jquery.chained.js
765 ms
jquery.chained.remote.js
764 ms
jquery.pixelentity.flare.min.js
1290 ms
bootstrap-table.js
778 ms
bootbox.min.js
782 ms
combine.css
1265 ms
style.css
1537 ms
responsive.css
1023 ms
bootstrap-tagsinput.css
1026 ms
bootstrap-table.css
1189 ms
select2-bootstrap.css
1279 ms
homepagelogo.css
1284 ms
sweetalert.css
1430 ms
cs_woocommerce.css
1489 ms
auth_script.js
1572 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
1573 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1574 ms
scripts.js
1675 ms
datatable.js
1739 ms
functions.js
1763 ms
event
24 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
logo-directory.png
259 ms
desktop-subheader-KL-Tower-1920x500.jpg
1571 ms
footer-logo.png
260 ms
icomoon.woff
1534 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
67 ms
footer-bg.jpg
350 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
lookp.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lookp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lookp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lookp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lookp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lookp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LookP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: