18.9 sec in total
6.7 sec
12.1 sec
148 ms
Visit lovelifelive.org now to see the best up-to-date Lovelifelive content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lovelifelive.org
Visit lovelifelive.orgWe analyzed Lovelifelive.org page load time and found that the first response time was 6.7 sec and then it took 12.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
lovelifelive.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value27.4 s
0/100
25%
Value15.8 s
0/100
10%
Value3,860 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value25.4 s
0/100
10%
6685 ms
479 ms
547 ms
545 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Lovelifelive.org, 8% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.loginradius.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Share.lrcontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Lovelifelive.org.
Page size can be reduced by 361.1 kB (71%)
510.0 kB
148.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Lovelifelive.org main page is 510.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 288.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lovelifelive needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 203.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 113.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovelifelive.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (68%)
38
12
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovelifelive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lovelifelive.org
6685 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
479 ms
lr-social-sharing-front.css
547 ms
social_widget.css
545 ms
css
25 ms
font-awesome.min.css
716 ms
style.css
717 ms
media-queries.css
545 ms
lr-social-login-front.css
1310 ms
www.lovelifelive.org
2671 ms
jquery.js
1466 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1422 ms
accordion.js
1463 ms
story-hovers.js
1099 ms
empty-textarea.js
1907 ms
video-container.js
1408 ms
main-menu.js
1510 ms
search-toggle.js
1590 ms
jquery.autogrow-textarea.js
1815 ms
placeholder-fix.js
1566 ms
jquery.scrollTo-min.js
1612 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1846 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1673 ms
loginradius_sharing.js
1816 ms
LoginRadius.js
9 ms
LoginRadiusSDK.2.0.0.js
1782 ms
LoginRadius.js
108 ms
icon-menu.png
209 ms
title-spacer-dark.png
133 ms
Fotolia_77905909_S.jpg
1018 ms
facebook.png
264 ms
twitter.png
574 ms
pinterest.png
747 ms
style.css
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
563 ms
LoginRadius.1.0.js
10 ms
logo.png
10 ms
xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
80 ms
.json
9 ms
lrshare_iconsprite32.png
5 ms
lovelifelive.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lovelifelive.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lovelifelive.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovelifelive.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lovelifelive.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lovelifelive.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lovelifelive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: