3.6 sec in total
705 ms
2.7 sec
237 ms
Click here to check amazing Lpl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lpl.by
«ЛПЛ Трейд» специализируется на продаже, сервисном обслуживании и ремонте упаковочного оборудования разных мировых производителей.
Visit lpl.byWe analyzed Lpl.by page load time and found that the first response time was 705 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lpl.by performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
705 ms
254 ms
527 ms
583 ms
539 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Lpl.by, 4% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) relates to the external source Catalog.tut.by.
Page size can be reduced by 174.3 kB (52%)
336.4 kB
162.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lpl.by main page is 336.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 135.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lpl needs image optimization as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 93.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 93.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lpl.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (45%)
47
26
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lpl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lpl.by
705 ms
main.css
254 ms
zzzenglish.css
527 ms
thickbox.css
583 ms
jquery-1.2.6.min.js
539 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.pack.js
293 ms
jquery.getUrlParam.js
293 ms
jquery.selectboxes.min.js
388 ms
jquery_sf_callsEN.js
439 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
451 ms
interface.js
520 ms
f.js
576 ms
default.css
338 ms
navigation.css
394 ms
layout.css
399 ms
forms.css
408 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.css
449 ms
catalog_tut_byfly_red.gif
962 ms
cycounter
254 ms
bg_head.jpg
543 ms
ico_home.gif
313 ms
lgo_toss-gmbh.gif
270 ms
bg_navwrapper.jpg
453 ms
bg_mainnav.jpg
182 ms
bg_navbar_verpackung.gif
312 ms
navigation.gif
333 ms
bg_contentwrapper.jpg
533 ms
bg_subnav-content.jpg
458 ms
bg_subnav-top.jpg
567 ms
bg_subnav-bottom.jpg
458 ms
bg_subnav-li.jpg
574 ms
bul_navigation.gif
593 ms
_editor_Termoform.jpg
617 ms
_editor_ZAP.jpg
815 ms
_editor_henkovac-heavy-duty-e-403xl.jpg
692 ms
_editor_provol.jpg
698 ms
_editor_33.jpg
698 ms
_editor_St_silik11.jpg
723 ms
_editor_op_btk.png
746 ms
_editor_op_velcom.png
817 ms
_editor_op_life.png
829 ms
_editor_google_logo_41.png
862 ms
watch.js
6 ms
bg_content.jpg
820 ms
bg_footer.jpg
847 ms
ga.js
25 ms
watch.js
4 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
allc.gif
257 ms
print.css
245 ms
catalog_tut_byfly_red.gif
397 ms
lpl.by accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lpl.by best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lpl.by SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
RU
DE
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lpl.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Lpl.by main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
lpl.by
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lpl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: