Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

156 ms

ltc25.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ltc 25 content for Algeria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ltc25.in

Visit ltc25.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Ltc25.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ltc25.in performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.824

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ltc25.in

1440 ms

bootstrap.min.css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

27 ms

mmc.js

197 ms

bootstrap.min.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Ltc25.in, 20% (20 requests) were made to Um.simpli.fi and 5% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ltc25.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 368.4 kB (58%)

Content Size

637.6 kB

After Optimization

269.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Ltc25.in main page is 637.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 296.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 51.7 kB

  • Original 82.0 kB
  • After minification 80.7 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 7.9 kB
  • After minification 7.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ltc 25 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 174.9 kB

  • Original 296.6 kB
  • After minification 292.2 kB
  • After compression 121.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174.9 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 141.8 kB

  • Original 251.2 kB
  • After minification 250.9 kB
  • After compression 109.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ltc25.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 141.8 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (82%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ltc 25. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ltc25.in accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

ltc25.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ltc25.in SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ltc25.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ltc25.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ltc 25. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: