23.7 sec in total
195 ms
4.1 sec
19.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Lucifr content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lucifr.com
Thoughts, stories and ideas.
Visit lucifr.comWe analyzed Lucifr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 195 ms and then it took 23.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
lucifr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value4.4 s
38/100
25%
Value3.7 s
86/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.4 s
93/100
10%
195 ms
76 ms
2604 ms
150 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Lucifr.com, 40% (14 requests) were made to Cdn.lucifr.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Lib.sinaapp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 143.7 kB (10%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Lucifr.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lucifr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.0 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lucifr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (27%)
33
24
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lucifr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lucifr.com
195 ms
style.css
76 ms
jquery.min.js
2604 ms
woodpress.js
150 ms
twitter.js
154 ms
instafeed.min.js
153 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
153 ms
gallery.js
153 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
153 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
298 ms
ga.js
90 ms
wood.jpg
367 ms
subtitle_workflow_1398874958.png
545 ms
social.png
314 ms
nav.jpg
293 ms
paper.png
292 ms
container.png
291 ms
omnifocus-iphone-language-switch.jpg
500 ms
omnifocus_perspective_icons.png
603 ms
shiori.png
498 ms
alfred_double_tap.jpg
497 ms
o3o_0.jpg
286 ms
o3o_1.png
792 ms
o3o_2.png
594 ms
o3o_3.png
491 ms
meet_ipsums.png
594 ms
iphone_dial_extension_1.jpg
603 ms
iphone_dial_extension_2.jpg
787 ms
iphone_dial_extension_3.jpg
595 ms
iphone_dial_extension_4.jpg
602 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
383 ms
__utm.gif
56 ms
moment.min.js
169 ms
count.js
109 ms
itunes_autolinkmaker.js
55 ms
lucifr.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
lucifr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lucifr.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lucifr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lucifr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lucifr.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lucifr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: