2.8 sec in total
966 ms
1.5 sec
305 ms
Click here to check amazing Lwlt content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lwlt.org
Visit lwlt.orgWe analyzed Lwlt.org page load time and found that the first response time was 966 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
lwlt.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value1,300 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.202
61/100
15%
Value10.3 s
25/100
10%
966 ms
151 ms
132 ms
141 ms
394 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Lwlt.org, 10% (2 requests) were made to Instagramstatic-a.akamaihd.net and 5% (1 request) were made to Imgssl.constantcontact.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (966 ms) belongs to the original domain Lwlt.org.
Page size can be reduced by 198.9 kB (60%)
329.5 kB
130.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Lwlt.org main page is 329.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 163.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lwlt needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 106.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lwlt.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)
19
9
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lwlt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lwlt.org
966 ms
prettylinks.css
151 ms
styles.css
132 ms
style.css
141 ms
style.css
394 ms
responsive.css
238 ms
jquery.js
398 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
266 ms
responsive-modernizr.min.js
377 ms
jquery.form.min.js
206 ms
scripts.js
265 ms
responsive-scripts.min.js
276 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
264 ms
safe_subscribe_logo.gif
151 ms
LWLT-LOGO.jpg
147 ms
LWLT-New-front-300x137.jpg
181 ms
findusonfacebook.gif
133 ms
follow_us-twitter.png
133 ms
cf5f02a7dec1.png
10 ms
d93e757e1104.png
7 ms
lwlt.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lwlt.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lwlt.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lwlt.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lwlt.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lwlt.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lwlt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: