Tools & Wizards About Us
medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk

Home - Medical Technologies IKC | University of Leeds

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

424 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

653 ms

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Medical Technologies Leeds content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk

The Medical Technologies IKC works to reduce the risk and uncertainty associated with new technologies, with a focus on the regenerative device sector.

Visit medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk

424 ms

medical-technologies.co.uk

250 ms

medical-technologies.co.uk

356 ms

css

77 ms

style.css

335 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk, 81% (38 requests) were made to Medical-technologies.co.uk and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Medical-technologies.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 692.7 kB (11%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 68.4 kB

  • Original 79.8 kB
  • After minification 70.7 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 617.2 kB

  • Original 6.3 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medical Technologies Leeds images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 958 B

  • Original 108.4 kB
  • After minification 108.4 kB
  • After compression 107.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 37.4 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (51%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medical Technologies Leeds. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk

424 ms

medical-technologies.co.uk

medical-technologies.co.uk

250 ms

medical-technologies.co.uk

medical-technologies.co.uk

356 ms

css

css

77 ms

style.css

style.css

335 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

77 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

73 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

386 ms

ajax-load-more.min.css

ajax-load-more.min.css

403 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

374 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

370 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

382 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

661 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

732 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

702 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

765 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

717 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

741 ms

vimeo.min.js

vimeo.min.js

992 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

707 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

728 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

723 ms

global.css

global.css

799 ms

extended.css

extended.css

762 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

378 ms

Medical-Technologies-Logo.png

Medical-Technologies-Logo.png

391 ms

UoL.png

UoL.png

358 ms

academic-guide-medtech-translation-web.png

academic-guide-medtech-translation-web.png

594 ms

case-study-section-sm-featured.png

case-study-section-sm-featured.png

364 ms

Helen-Berry-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

Helen-Berry-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

805 ms

case-study-section-sm.png

case-study-section-sm.png

674 ms

Animesh-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

Animesh-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

1058 ms

Ben-van-Duren-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER-1.png

Ben-van-Duren-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER-1.png

1014 ms

Chaozong-Liu-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

Chaozong-Liu-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

1096 ms

candy-mccabe-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

candy-mccabe-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

1304 ms

tom-baboolal-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

tom-baboolal-IKC-case-study-WEB-COVER.png

1404 ms

POC-guide-IKC-WEB-COVER-CROP.png

POC-guide-IKC-WEB-COVER-CROP.png

1185 ms

twitter-title.png

twitter-title.png

1340 ms

follow-twitter.png

follow-twitter.png

1389 ms

backtop.png

backtop.png

1438 ms

EPSRClogo.png

EPSRClogo.png

1581 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

118 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

120 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

175 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

150 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

mejs-controls.svg

mejs-controls.svg

1344 ms

Accessibility Review

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

medical-technologies.leeds.ac.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Medical Technologies Leeds. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: