1.6 sec in total
225 ms
1.2 sec
167 ms
Visit suffolk.libguides.com now to see the best up-to-date Suffolk Lib Guides content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about suffolk.libguides.com
Visit suffolk.libguides.comWe analyzed Suffolk.libguides.com page load time and found that the first response time was 225 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
suffolk.libguides.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value730 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.383
27/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
225 ms
136 ms
145 ms
276 ms
4 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Suffolk.libguides.com, 34% (13 requests) were made to Lgimages.s3.amazonaws.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (637 ms) relates to the external source Lgimages.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 419.6 kB (68%)
615.6 kB
196.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Suffolk.libguides.com main page is 615.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 449.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 428 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Suffolk Lib Guides images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 307.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Suffolk.libguides.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (39%)
36
22
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Suffolk Lib Guides. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
suffolk.libguides.com
225 ms
tundra.css
136 ms
libguides.css
145 ms
dojo.js
276 ms
jquery-1.7.min.js
4 ms
lang.php
106 ms
lgpublic.min.js
140 ms
lib_spring_track.php
103 ms
api_search.php
78 ms
chat_load_client_in.js
73 ms
analytics.js
11 ms
noise.jpg
90 ms
bg3.gif
178 ms
scholar_sm.gif
138 ms
bg_page_grey.gif
309 ms
stitle.gif
184 ms
form_input_background_grey.gif
637 ms
box-icons.gif
534 ms
mildredfsawyer_lockup.png
106 ms
blogger.gif
58 ms
images
21 ms
loading_lg.gif
159 ms
dot.gif
167 ms
sawyerreference.jpg
396 ms
indicator.gif
345 ms
tippointer.gif
323 ms
window_close_grey.gif
312 ms
linkid.js
7 ms
collect
5 ms
collect
56 ms
chat_client_in.js
55 ms
desc_back.gif
419 ms
popup_back.gif
429 ms
collect
18 ms
buttonEnabled.png
37 ms
jquery.min.js
5 ms
chat_client_inline_iframe.css
10 ms
chat_client_status.php
71 ms
suffolk.libguides.com accessibility score
suffolk.libguides.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
suffolk.libguides.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Suffolk.libguides.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Suffolk.libguides.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
suffolk.libguides.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Suffolk Lib Guides. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: