5.1 sec in total
2.1 sec
2.7 sec
206 ms
Click here to check amazing M Nassar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about m-nassar.com
Visit m-nassar.comWe analyzed M-nassar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
m-nassar.com performance score
2147 ms
115 ms
22 ms
126 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original M-nassar.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain M-nassar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (74%)
2.2 MB
581.2 kB
In fact, the total size of M-nassar.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, M Nassar needs image optimization as it can save up to 110.3 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 505.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 505.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. M-nassar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (85%)
52
8
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M Nassar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
m-nassar.com
2147 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
115 ms
jquery-ui.css
22 ms
styles.css
126 ms
bootstrap.css
130 ms
font-awesome.min.css
150 ms
magnific-popup.css
110 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
167 ms
responsiveslides.css
174 ms
jquery.classycompare.css
173 ms
style.css
228 ms
toranj-woocommerce.css
202 ms
fontello-500px.css
221 ms
js_composer.min.css
351 ms
masterslider.main.css
281 ms
custom.css
271 ms
toranj-msslider.css
275 ms
jquery.js
326 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
326 ms
modernizr.min.js
6 ms
font-faces.css
82 ms
core.min.js
78 ms
datepicker.min.js
90 ms
jquery.form.min.js
261 ms
scripts.js
261 ms
comment-reply.min.js
264 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
261 ms
jquery.history.js
262 ms
TweenMax.min.js
264 ms
jquery.owwwlab-DoubleCarousel.js
263 ms
jquery.owwwlab-video.js
264 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
267 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
265 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
269 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
265 ms
smoothscroll.js
266 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
236 ms
jquery.classycompare.js
235 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
295 ms
jquery.dropdown.js
296 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
298 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
297 ms
waypoints.min.js
308 ms
js_composer_front.js
310 ms
custom.js
334 ms
wp-embed.min.js
316 ms
js_composer_front.js
311 ms
clipboard-Converted-01-01.png
338 ms
chocolate-02.png
342 ms
0221.jpg
335 ms
brock-davis-wallpaper-2-1280x800.jpg
336 ms
141.jpg
338 ms
5847708152_5d9a177d33_o.jpg
339 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
314 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
238 ms
raleway-semibold-webfont.woff
50 ms
raleway-extrabold-webfont.woff
57 ms
m-nassar.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M-nassar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that M-nassar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
m-nassar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of M Nassar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: