3 sec in total
78 ms
932 ms
2 sec
Visit magetalk.com now to see the best up-to-date Mage Talk content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about magetalk.com
Magento community guys discussing all the things.
Visit magetalk.comWe analyzed Magetalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
magetalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value24.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.601
10/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
78 ms
43 ms
14 ms
24 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Magetalk.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) relates to the external source Magetalkcom.disqus.com.
Page size can be reduced by 692.8 kB (74%)
930.4 kB
237.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Magetalk.com main page is 930.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 458.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 774 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mage Talk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 302.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 302.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 318.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Magetalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 318.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (83%)
35
6
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mage Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
magetalk.com
78 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
43 ms
A.shortcodes.css,qver=4.4.2.pagespeed.cf.q53Viz_2Ae.css
14 ms
css
24 ms
css
36 ms
css
46 ms
A.bootstrap.min.css,qver=4.4.2.pagespeed.cf.AaoxDNRwWD.css
54 ms
A.flexslider.css,qver=4.4.2.pagespeed.cf.YtSFmm1hng.css
26 ms
A.lightbox.css,qver=4.4.2.pagespeed.cf.5CSScbV8St.css
20 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
18 ms
style.css
65 ms
A.style.php,qver=4.4.2.pagespeed.cf.7jNFVCa3Cg.css
31 ms
A.jetpack.css,qver=3.9.2.pagespeed.cf.AwxtUQQqDV.css
24 ms
jquery.js,qver=1.11.3.pagespeed.jm.zixJPNMRNN.js
84 ms
wp-includes,_js,_jquery,_jquery-migrate.min.js,qver==1.2.1+wp-includes,_js,_jquery,_ui,_core.min.js,qver==1.11.4+wp-includes,_js,_jquery,_ui,_widget.min.js,qver==1.11.4+wp-includes,_js,_jquery,_ui,_accordion.min.js,qver==1.11.4+wp-includes,_js,_jquery,_ui,_tabs.min.js,qver==1.11.4+wp-content,_plugins,_thst-shortcodes,_js,_thst-shortcodes-lib.js,qver==4.4.2+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_modernizr.js,qver==1.0+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_res_men.js,qver==1.0+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_jquery.stellar.min.js,qver==0.6.1.pagespeed.jc.4j_I6EKp3b.js
95 ms
A.mediaelementplayer.min.css,qver=2.18.1.pagespeed.cf.N8Jsg7dvmk.css
30 ms
A.wp-mediaelement.css,qver=4.4.2.pagespeed.cf.fLm53XUVQU.css
35 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
11 ms
gprofiles.js
60 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
71 ms
wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_call_fitvid.js,qver==1.0+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_jquery.easing.1.2.js,qver==1.0+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_lightbox-2.6.min.js,qver==2.6+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_widgets,_js,_thst-recent-posts.js,qver==1.0+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_jquery.flexslider-min.js,qver==1.0+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_call_flexslider.js,qver==1.0+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js,qver==2.8.3+wp-content,_themes,_podcaster,_js,_call-contscr.js,qver==2.8.3+wp-includes,_js,_wp-embed.min.js,qver==4.4.2.pagespeed.jc.NbnIqwca4P.js
39 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
76 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
classic-081711.css
13 ms
3e51a4bdb0aad49b7b89cafdb7792722d00d03cb.js
41 ms
bbb30ec2a1a9fc044ad2073012026b06
114 ms
count.js
95 ms
widgets.js
93 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
11 ms
xlogo-blog.png.pagespeed.ic.4RjTFLPfhm.png
9 ms
header-loading-ani.gif
53 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
9 ms
count-data.js
466 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
hovercard.css
49 ms
services.css
93 ms
g.gif
39 ms
collect
43 ms
collect
73 ms
magetalk.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
magetalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
magetalk.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Magetalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Magetalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
magetalk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mage Talk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: