3.6 sec in total
86 ms
1.1 sec
2.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Makeup Reviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about makeup-reviews.com
Discover the best Beauty Products with thousands of reviews from Makeup junkies and pros. Find the best mascaras, eyeliners, acne treatments, and more!
Visit makeup-reviews.comWe analyzed Makeup-reviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
makeup-reviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5,170 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
86 ms
240 ms
51 ms
42 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Makeup-reviews.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (498 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.
Page size can be reduced by 239.1 kB (37%)
655.0 kB
415.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Makeup-reviews.com main page is 655.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 299.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 235.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 84.3 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 235.4 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Makeup-reviews.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (87%)
23
3
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Makeup Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
makeup-reviews.com
86 ms
adsbygoogle.js
240 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
51 ms
widget.css
42 ms
style.min.css
60 ms
rate-my-post.css
43 ms
css
34 ms
bootstrap.min.css
63 ms
all.min.css
75 ms
chosen.css
72 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
77 ms
style.css
83 ms
dashicons.min.css
100 ms
a-z-listing-default.css
92 ms
jquery.js
80 ms
rate-my-post.js
204 ms
fitvids.js
203 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
208 ms
chosen.js
211 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
206 ms
dosislite-scripts.js
207 ms
wp-embed.min.js
212 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBiEJow.ttf
313 ms
show_ads_impl.js
498 ms
zrt_lookup.html
230 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYA.ttf
164 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYA.ttf
218 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
164 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
163 ms
wARDj0u
4 ms
makeup-reviews.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
makeup-reviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
makeup-reviews.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Makeup-reviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Makeup-reviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
makeup-reviews.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: