Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

manfellowband.com

会社とスムーズに交渉してくれるのが残業代請求に強い法律事務所

Page Load Speed

24.8 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

22.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

manfellowband.com screenshot

About Website

Visit manfellowband.com now to see the best up-to-date Manfellowband content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about manfellowband.com

勤めている会社に対して、残業代未払いの請求をしたのに、全く相手にされることなく邪慳に扱われてしまったという経験がある方は、残業代請求に詳しい法律事務所に相談して、しっかりと準備をしてから会社に残業代請求をしてみましょう。会社に対して個人で残

Visit manfellowband.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Manfellowband.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 23.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 3 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

manfellowband.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.manfellowband.com

1035 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

346 ms

button.css

350 ms

font-awesome.css

310 ms

bootstrap.min.css

392 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Manfellowband.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to S4.bcbits.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Manfellowband.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (19%)

Content Size

8.8 MB

After Optimization

7.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Manfellowband.com main page is 8.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 44.4 kB
  • After minification 41.3 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 825.8 kB

  • Original 7.6 MB
  • After minification 6.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Manfellowband needs image optimization as it can save up to 825.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 403.3 kB

  • Original 564.1 kB
  • After minification 486.4 kB
  • After compression 160.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 403.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 431.1 kB

  • Original 508.1 kB
  • After minification 461.9 kB
  • After compression 77.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Manfellowband.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 431.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (82%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Manfellowband. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

manfellowband.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Manfellowband.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Manfellowband.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Manfellowband. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: