Tools & Wizards About Us
materialsix.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

materialsix.com

Materialsix Home - Make Your Home Significantly Better

Page Load Speed

24.2 sec in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

21.1 sec

Page Rendered

2.8 sec

materialsix.com screenshot

About Website

Visit materialsix.com now to see the best up-to-date Materialsix content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about materialsix.com

Latest Articles & Guides << See All Articles >> Home Decor Ideas Home Improvements Patio & Porch Cleaning Tips Deck Decorating Ideas Living Room Other Articles

Visit materialsix.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Materialsix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 23.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

materialsix.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

materialsix.com

334 ms

cash.js

46 ms

austin.js

33 ms

jquery.min.js

380 ms

ytprefs.min.js

801 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Materialsix.com, 24% (13 requests) were made to Sync.go.sonobi.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Ssl-market-east.smrtb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 163.2 kB (49%)

Content Size

335.7 kB

After Optimization

172.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Materialsix.com main page is 335.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 196.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 162.3 kB

  • Original 196.4 kB
  • After minification 196.4 kB
  • After compression 34.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Materialsix images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 918 B

  • Original 138.1 kB
  • After minification 138.1 kB
  • After compression 137.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (86%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Materialsix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

materialsix.com

materialsix.com

334 ms

cash.js

cash.js

46 ms

austin.js

austin.js

33 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

380 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

801 ms

103dc54af06512a686c4f98e4bb7d6800ad77d42.js

103dc54af06512a686c4f98e4bb7d6800ad77d42.js

380 ms

js

js

443 ms

sticky.min.js

sticky.min.js

377 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

404 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

405 ms

navigation-search.min.js

navigation-search.min.js

402 ms

back-to-top.min.js

back-to-top.min.js

423 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

422 ms

wp-socializer.min.js

wp-socializer.min.js

426 ms

minimal-analytics.js

minimal-analytics.js

426 ms

augusta.js

augusta.js

570 ms

uc.js

uc.js

568 ms

fads.js

fads.js

554 ms

banger.js

banger.js

542 ms

cmbv2.js

cmbv2.js

534 ms

ezoic.png

ezoic.png

671 ms

apstag.js

apstag.js

636 ms

houston.js

houston.js

171 ms

js

js

235 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

473 ms

match

match

585 ms

setuid

setuid

588 ms

pixel

pixel

643 ms

30907

30907

713 ms

all

all

19980 ms

cmbdv2.js

cmbdv2.js

380 ms

nmash2.js

nmash2.js

351 ms

collect

collect

99 ms

us.gif

us.gif

22 ms

collect

collect

206 ms

demconf.jpg

demconf.jpg

47 ms

pixel

pixel

100 ms

us.gif

us.gif

30 ms

us.gif

us.gif

97 ms

pixel

pixel

141 ms

us.gif

us.gif

134 ms

us.gif

us.gif

120 ms

pixel

pixel

111 ms

us.gif

us.gif

115 ms

info2

info2

105 ms

pixel

pixel

99 ms

usg.gif

usg.gif

71 ms

us.gif

us.gif

67 ms

us.gif

us.gif

93 ms

basher.ezodn.com

basher.ezodn.com

120 ms

us.gif

us.gif

76 ms

us.gif

us.gif

68 ms

us.gif

us.gif

8 ms

dall.js

dall.js

242 ms

Accessibility Review

materialsix.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

materialsix.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

materialsix.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Materialsix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Materialsix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

materialsix.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: