20.1 sec in total
749 ms
16.7 sec
2.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Medmar Eg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about medmar-eg.com
Looking for a Medmar Egypt Company? Memdar Egypt has brought their clients results using Facebook, SEO , Whatsapp and email marketing
Visit medmar-eg.comWe analyzed Medmar-eg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 749 ms and then it took 19.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
medmar-eg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value23.2 s
1/100
10%
749 ms
94 ms
147 ms
143 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Medmar-eg.com, 25% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.4 sec) relates to the external source Static.whatshelp.io.
Page size can be reduced by 131.3 kB (4%)
3.1 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Medmar-eg.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medmar Eg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medmar-eg.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (65%)
54
19
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medmar Eg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
medmar-eg.com
749 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
94 ms
style.min.css
147 ms
styles.css
143 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
118 ms
settings.css
143 ms
bootstrap.min.css
132 ms
stm.css
164 ms
style.css
185 ms
font-awesome.min.css
213 ms
select2.min.css
210 ms
css
42 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
225 ms
animations.min.css
223 ms
frontend.min.css
227 ms
global.css
245 ms
js_composer.min.css
274 ms
css
43 ms
jquery.js
321 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
319 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
339 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
338 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
317 ms
owl.carousel.css
375 ms
css
45 ms
scripts.js
376 ms
bootstrap.min.js
379 ms
select2.min.js
378 ms
custom.js
369 ms
SmoothScroll.js
369 ms
wp-embed.min.js
404 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
404 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
421 ms
countUp.min.js
421 ms
jquery.appear.js
422 ms
vivus.min.js
440 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
456 ms
logo.png
145 ms
666.png
130 ms
slider_3.jpg
565 ms
TexasTanker_EN-US10728959498_1366x7681.jpg
560 ms
Intro.jpg
562 ms
Tanker_ship_Ships_Sea_502308.jpg
565 ms
slider_1.jpg
561 ms
logo.png
227 ms
1.png
566 ms
slider_3-255x170.jpg
561 ms
AdobeStock_75190931-1110x550-255x170.jpeg
564 ms
33-255x170.png
565 ms
66-1-255x170.png
567 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
143 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
145 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
146 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
144 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
146 ms
stm.ttf
584 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmC6ZRbrw.woff
143 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdM3mC6ZRbrw.woff
146 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGIVzZZabuWI.woff
480 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffAzHGIVzZZabuWI.woff
480 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGIVzZZabuWI.woff
146 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGIVzZZabuWI.woff
149 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffEDBGIVzZZabuWI.woff
481 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
489 ms
init.js
15365 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
114 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
116 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
111 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
107 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
21 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
23 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
23 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
23 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff
24 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
24 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
24 ms
medmar-eg.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
medmar-eg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
medmar-eg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medmar-eg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medmar-eg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
medmar-eg.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Medmar Eg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: