3.7 sec in total
801 ms
2.3 sec
677 ms
Click here to check amazing Micromail content for Latvia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about micromail.com
Software licensing services from sales and consultancy to software asset management
Visit micromail.comWe analyzed Micromail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 801 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
micromail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value5.2 s
59/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.68
8/100
15%
Value8.4 s
38/100
10%
801 ms
165 ms
169 ms
166 ms
167 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Micromail.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Widgets.ziftsolutions.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (801 ms) belongs to the original domain Micromail.com.
Page size can be reduced by 126.2 kB (31%)
403.3 kB
277.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Micromail.com main page is 403.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 224.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Micromail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 71.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.7 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Micromail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)
48
19
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micromail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.micromail.com
801 ms
common.css
165 ms
navigation.css
169 ms
list_detail.css
166 ms
ui.tabs.css
167 ms
checkout_custom.css
168 ms
checkout_standard.css
241 ms
contact-form.css
244 ms
jquery.magico.shop.css
244 ms
lightbox.css
247 ms
nyroModal.css
246 ms
jquery.js
410 ms
jquery.magico.magislider.js
322 ms
json.js
325 ms
jquery.color.js
253 ms
inheritance.js
254 ms
jquery.magico.shop.js
497 ms
8a71b31f3ea525fb013ea7d48bba2a34
41 ms
bg_outerHeader.gif
83 ms
logo_micromail.gif
89 ms
btn_search.gif
89 ms
bg_home_priFeatures.gif
88 ms
W285_F_Image_14_72508.jpg
655 ms
W285_F_Image_14_73540.jpg
408 ms
W285_F_Image_14_71283.jpg
487 ms
logo_iso.jpg
165 ms
icon_facebook.jpg
165 ms
icon_twitter.jpg
165 ms
bg_galleryNav.gif
237 ms
galleryNav01.gif
238 ms
galleryNav02.gif
238 ms
galleryNav03.gif
319 ms
bg_header_230_blk.gif
322 ms
arrow_link_list.gif
322 ms
bg_h4_market.gif
402 ms
bg_h4_services.gif
402 ms
arrow_link.gif
401 ms
bg_h4_sam.gif
478 ms
bg_h4_quicklinks.gif
482 ms
bg_header_712_blue.gif
482 ms
brand_microsoft.gif
483 ms
brand_adobe_gold.png
639 ms
brand_symantec.gif
560 ms
brand_embarcadero.gif
564 ms
brand_vmware.gif
564 ms
brand_corel.gif
564 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
nr-892.min.js
41 ms
micromail.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
micromail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
micromail.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Micromail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Micromail.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
micromail.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Micromail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: