3.7 sec in total
386 ms
3 sec
264 ms
Visit miloweb.net now to see the best up-to-date Miloweb content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about miloweb.net
Vine Linux+Apache+Yahoo!BBで自宅サーバの構築方法を紹介しています。Win2000+Apache環境でのサーバ構築も紹介しています。
Visit miloweb.netWe analyzed Miloweb.net page load time and found that the first response time was 386 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
miloweb.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value1,650 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.171
70/100
15%
Value9.5 s
31/100
10%
386 ms
573 ms
340 ms
444 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Miloweb.net, 10% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 9% (6 requests) were made to Cache1.value-domain.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (583 ms) relates to the external source Cache1.value-domain.com.
Page size can be reduced by 169.1 kB (55%)
306.1 kB
137.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Miloweb.net main page is 306.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 150.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Miloweb needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 92.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.6 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Miloweb.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (56%)
57
25
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miloweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
miloweb.net
386 ms
www.miloweb.net
573 ms
default.css
340 ms
xrea_header.js
444 ms
brand
34 ms
show_ads.js
4 ms
dayx.cgi
337 ms
dayx.cgi
340 ms
dayx.cgi
355 ms
brand
56 ms
urchin.js
21 ms
logo.css
181 ms
style.css
342 ms
xrea_header.css
147 ms
title006.gif
365 ms
start001.gif
392 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
169 ms
ca-pub-9706165895616198.js
127 ms
zrt_lookup.html
136 ms
show_ads_impl.js
68 ms
__utm.gif
56 ms
ads
325 ms
osd.js
36 ms
ads
199 ms
ads
202 ms
ads
172 ms
css
80 ms
m_js_controller.js
41 ms
abg.js
43 ms
156 ms
adj
72 ms
beacon
69 ms
favicon
111 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
31 ms
s
23 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
94 ms
x_button_blue2.png
14 ms
70 ms
0
172 ms
pixel
166 ms
lidar.js
25 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
14 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
19 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
23 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
146 ms
HTKL00533001.jpg
213 ms
adServer.bs
159 ms
verify_selector.js
225 ms
blank.gif
212 ms
bapi
174 ms
pixel
73 ms
pixel
75 ms
verifyr.js
29 ms
client-verify.adtricity.com
465 ms
beacon.js
76 ms
dbapi
32 ms
0
31 ms
bg.png
36 ms
adchoices.en.png
57 ms
dt
81 ms
dt
70 ms
sd
31 ms
banner_xrea_sp.gif
148 ms
banner_background.png
571 ms
searchbox.png
583 ms
banner_button.png
292 ms
ui
27 ms
miloweb.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
miloweb.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
miloweb.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
JA
JA
SHIFT_JIS
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miloweb.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Miloweb.net main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
miloweb.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Miloweb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: