Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

milward.com

Milward Alloys Aluminum & Copper Alloying Additives

Page Load Speed

724 ms in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

474 ms

Page Rendered

112 ms

milward.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Milward content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about milward.com

Milward Alloys manufactures hardeners, grain refiners, modifiers and deoxidants for the aluminum and copper melting industries.

Visit milward.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Milward.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 586 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

milward.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

milward.com

138 ms

header.jpg

37 ms

button.jpg

64 ms

photo.jpg

117 ms

ga.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Milward.com, 25% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (1 request) were made to Webtraxs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (268 ms) relates to the external source Webtraxs.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.0 kB (5%)

Content Size

74.0 kB

After Optimization

69.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Milward.com main page is 74.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 50.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 61% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 26 B

  • Original 50.0 kB
  • After minification 50.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Milward images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 752 B

  • Original 18.5 kB
  • After minification 18.5 kB
  • After compression 17.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Milward. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

milward.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

milward.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

milward.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Milward.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Milward.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Milward. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: