Access mimipia.com.

mimipia.com screenshot

100

Performance

Renders faster than
97% of other websites
68

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 33% of websites
83

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
56% of websites
55

SEO

Google-friendlier than
20% of websites

First Response

859 ms

Resources Loaded

115.4 sec

Page Rendered

460 ms

mimipia.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mimipia content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mimipia.com

Visit mimipia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mimipia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 859 ms and then it took 115.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 170 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

mimipia.com

859 ms

index.aspx

4769 ms

base.css

2564 ms

layout.css

2611 ms

Javascript_designer.js

1153 ms

Our browser made a total of 192 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Mimipia.com, 79% (152 requests) were made to Image.mimipia.com and 5% (10 requests) were made to Image.mimipia.co.kr. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Image.mimipia.co.kr.

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

185.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Mimipia.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 869.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 89.9 kB

Original 111.3 kB
After minification 95.7 kB
After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 711.8 kB

Original 869.5 kB
After minification 573.3 kB
After compression 157.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 711.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

Original 34.9 kB
After minification 33.0 kB
After compression 6.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mimipia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mimipia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

N/A
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

EUC-KR

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mimipia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Mimipia.com main page’s claimed encoding is euc-kr. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

mimipia.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mimipia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: