Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

mirc.com

mIRC: Internet Relay Chat client

Page Load Speed

410 ms in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

257 ms

Page Rendered

80 ms

mirc.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mirc.com now to see the best up-to-date MIRC content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mirc.com

mIRC: Internet Relay Chat client

Visit mirc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mirc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 337 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mirc.com performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mirc.com

73 ms

www.mirc.com

100 ms

layout.css

33 ms

barlogo.gif

64 ms

indexlogo.gif

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Mirc.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (100 ms) belongs to the original domain Mirc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.4 kB (70%)

Content Size

73.4 kB

After Optimization

22.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Mirc.com main page is 73.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 59.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 7.1 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 40.2 kB

  • Original 59.5 kB
  • After minification 59.5 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mirc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MIRC. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

mirc.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

mirc.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

mirc.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mirc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mirc.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MIRC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: