4.1 sec in total
1 sec
2.9 sec
210 ms
Visit monitorinstitute.com now to see the best up-to-date Monitor Institute content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about monitorinstitute.com
Monitor Institute by Deloitte works with social impact leaders to help surface and pioneer practices—breakthrough approaches for societal challenges.
Visit monitorinstitute.comWe analyzed Monitorinstitute.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
monitorinstitute.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value5,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.51
15/100
15%
Value22.6 s
1/100
10%
1022 ms
146 ms
30 ms
73 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Monitorinstitute.com, 17% (11 requests) were made to and 3% (2 requests) were made to Wd-edge.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Monitorinstitute.com.
Page size can be reduced by 414.3 kB (20%)
2.1 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Monitorinstitute.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Monitor Institute images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 232.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 232.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Monitorinstitute.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (40%)
48
29
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Monitor Institute. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
monitorinstitute.com
1022 ms
roc6che.js
146 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jquery.tweet.js
73 ms
smooth.pack.js
155 ms
mootools-1.2.1-core-yc.js
206 ms
mootools-1.2-more.js
156 ms
jd.gallery.js
139 ms
jd.gallery.css
152 ms
buttons.js
16 ms
monitor_institute_styles.css
154 ms
d
143 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
175 ms
ga.js
157 ms
logo_header.jpg
167 ms
p.gif
121 ms
user_timeline.json
109 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
178 ms
slideshow1.jpg
541 ms
slideshow2.jpg
1159 ms
slideshow3.jpg
1119 ms
slideshow4.jpg
1143 ms
slideshow5.jpg
1157 ms
slideshow6.jpg
944 ms
whats-next.jpg
887 ms
wicked-opportunities.jpg
1164 ms
wn4cp.jpg
1091 ms
separator-gray-dashed.jpg
1168 ms
separator-red-solid-2px.jpg
1189 ms
rss.png
1229 ms
twitter.png
1240 ms
facebook.png
1243 ms
envelope.png
1242 ms
phone.png
1238 ms
loading-bar-black.gif
1274 ms
fleche1.png
1299 ms
fleche2.png
1307 ms
AAMAAAABAAAAAMbULpkAAAAAynAFbQAAAADKeE68
153 ms
wADAAAAAQAAAADG1C6ZAAAAAMpwBW4AAAAAynhOtg==
153 ms
AAMAAAABAAAAAMbULpkAAAAAynAFbwAAAADKeE65
152 ms
LADKBYlEAU6EQkwAAAAAAAQAAAADG1C6ZAAAAAMopKNYAAAAAyimLRw==
151 ms
Si1GwGt5zEkjyGGAY2BhBgZGAC6uJhYPwfywAygWJRAFOhEJMAAAAAAAEAAAAAxtQumQAAAADKKSjPAAAAAMopi0A=
149 ms
LADKBYlEAU6EQkwAAAAAAAQAAAADG1C6ZAAAAAMopKNkAAAAAyimLSg==
149 ms
wADAAAAAQAAAADG1C6ZAAAAAMpwBXEAAAAAynhOuw==
147 ms
AAMAAAABAAAAAMbULpkAAAAAynAFcgAAAADKeE61
147 ms
8AAwAAAAEAAAAAxtQumQAAAADKcAV0AAAAAMp4Trc=
145 ms
Nw8BiYXN58QBr6cxJI8BhUGNgYQYGRgAqrkYWD8P5EBpAurKACufQnmAAAAAAABAAAAAMbULpkAAAAAyikf0AAAAADKKYJB
145 ms
KAAAAAMopgjs=
144 ms
__utm.gif
128 ms
getSegment.php
22 ms
checkOAuth.esi
192 ms
t.dhj
8 ms
t.dhj
23 ms
cm
44 ms
x35248
127 ms
s-3271.xgi
27 ms
hbpix
150 ms
pixel
60 ms
17 ms
8 ms
xrefid.xgi
13 ms
pixel
23 ms
2981
22 ms
monitorinstitute.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
monitorinstitute.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
monitorinstitute.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Monitorinstitute.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Monitorinstitute.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
monitorinstitute.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Monitor Institute. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: