5.3 sec in total
556 ms
4.2 sec
562 ms
Visit moontalk.com now to see the best up-to-date Moontalk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about moontalk.com
Be present Make the connection with Moontalk. Developing UCaaS Unified Communications as a Service is a cloud-based solution model for all of a businesses communications applications. We are developin...
Visit moontalk.comWe analyzed Moontalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 556 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
moontalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value1,270 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value12.7 s
13/100
10%
556 ms
47 ms
109 ms
216 ms
314 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Moontalk.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (946 ms) belongs to the original domain Moontalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 76.2 kB (10%)
742.0 kB
665.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Moontalk.com main page is 742.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 612.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Moontalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (84%)
68
11
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moontalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
moontalk.com
556 ms
script.js
47 ms
style.min.css
109 ms
style.min.css
216 ms
style.min.css
314 ms
theme.min.css
315 ms
header-footer.min.css
324 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
432 ms
post-7.css
324 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
325 ms
swiper.min.css
419 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
418 ms
post-3691.css
436 ms
post-36.css
436 ms
post-41.css
437 ms
post-6038.css
523 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
522 ms
style.css
539 ms
ecs-style.css
540 ms
post-247.css
538 ms
post-3000.css
539 ms
css
79 ms
fontawesome.min.css
626 ms
solid.min.css
630 ms
language-cookie.js
646 ms
jquery.min.js
752 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
645 ms
script.min.js
645 ms
ecs_ajax_pagination.js
730 ms
ecs.js
731 ms
js
81 ms
optimize.js
79 ms
dynamic.js
286 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
818 ms
formreset.min.css
816 ms
formsmain.min.css
816 ms
readyclass.min.css
856 ms
browsers.min.css
858 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
867 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
867 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
867 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
866 ms
log
408 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
946 ms
dom-ready.min.js
735 ms
hooks.min.js
664 ms
i18n.min.js
663 ms
a11y.min.js
655 ms
jquery.json.min.js
654 ms
gravityforms.min.js
764 ms
utils.min.js
674 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
674 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
659 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
655 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
722 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
723 ms
frontend.min.js
672 ms
waypoints.min.js
671 ms
core.min.js
655 ms
frontend.min.js
655 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
723 ms
lines.svg
477 ms
logo.png
501 ms
Moontalk-icon_ucaas.png
502 ms
Moontalk-icon_customer-benefits.png
502 ms
5.0-outbound-lists-dashboard-ENG-v2.png
609 ms
5.4-outbound-call-active-EN.png
572 ms
fragmented-communication-1-1.jpeg
881 ms
Puolueellinen-vertailu-moontalk.png
717 ms
moontalk-end-user-is-king.jpeg
897 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexU1W8aevHQ.woff
54 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRW8aevHQ.woff
54 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNW8aevHQ.woff
69 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexTpW8aevHQ.woff
74 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexaFR8aevHQ.woff
82 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNR8aevHQ.woff
82 ms
font
134 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNR8aevHQ.woff
81 ms
moontalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
moontalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
moontalk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moontalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moontalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moontalk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Moontalk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: