Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

Page Load Speed

15.2 sec in total

First Response

2.1 sec

Resources Loaded

12.6 sec

Page Rendered

435 ms

mums-diary.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit mums-diary.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Mums Diary content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mums-diary.co.uk

Visit mums-diary.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Mums-diary.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 13.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mums-diary.co.uk performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.mums-diary.co.uk

2124 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

276 ms

public.css

292 ms

form_style.css

296 ms

events_manager.css

504 ms

Our browser made a total of 167 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (124 requests) were addressed to the original Mums-diary.co.uk, 3% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Mums-diary.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (34%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Mums-diary.co.uk main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 163.4 kB

  • Original 196.3 kB
  • After minification 151.2 kB
  • After compression 32.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.1 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 133.4 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mums Diary images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 667.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 993.9 kB
  • After compression 354.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 667.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 253.5 kB

  • Original 316.5 kB
  • After minification 272.2 kB
  • After compression 63.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mums-diary.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (56%)

Requests Now

163

After Optimization

72

The browser has sent 163 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mums Diary. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 57 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mums-diary.co.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

mums-diary.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mums-diary.co.uk SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mums-diary.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mums-diary.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mums Diary. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: