Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

tools.mile.com

Trucking Software, Truck Software, Dispatch Software, Mileage Software, Transportation Software, Routing Software, Fueltax Software, Driverlog Softwar...

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

429 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

360 ms

tools.mile.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tools.mile.com now to see the best up-to-date Tools Mile content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tools.mile.com

Trucking software for truckers, brokers, shippers, and trucks including truck software, dispatch software, mileage software, routing software, load matching services, dispatch and accounting software,...

Visit tools.mile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tools.mile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 429 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tools.mile.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.104

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tools.mile.com

429 ms

style.css

201 ms

navstyle.css

202 ms

header.js

169 ms

urchin.js

4 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Tools.mile.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to T3.trackalyzer.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) relates to the external source Formalyzer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 313.7 kB (81%)

Content Size

387.7 kB

After Optimization

74.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Tools.mile.com main page is 387.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 324.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

  • Original 63.6 kB
  • After minification 50.9 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 262.3 kB

  • Original 324.1 kB
  • After minification 288.6 kB
  • After compression 61.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (60%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tools Mile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tools.mile.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

tools.mile.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

tools.mile.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tools.mile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tools.mile.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tools Mile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: