5.5 sec in total
202 ms
5.1 sec
112 ms
Visit tracker.moodle.org now to see the best up-to-date Tracker Moodle content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tracker.moodle.org
Visit tracker.moodle.orgWe analyzed Tracker.moodle.org page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
tracker.moodle.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value1,050 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.134
80/100
15%
Value10.5 s
24/100
10%
202 ms
550 ms
812 ms
954 ms
1027 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Tracker.moodle.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tracker.moodle.org.
Page size can be reduced by 50.6 kB (69%)
73.1 kB
22.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Tracker.moodle.org main page is 73.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 55.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tracker Moodle needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 41% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (55%)
33
15
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tracker Moodle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tracker.moodle.org
202 ms
Dashboard.jspa
550 ms
batch.css
812 ms
batch.css
954 ms
batch.js
1027 ms
batch.js
1239 ms
batch.js
468 ms
batch.js
469 ms
jira.webresources:calendar-en.js
876 ms
jira.webresources:calendar-localisation-moment.js
879 ms
shortcuts.js
1212 ms
css
67 ms
license
446 ms
223 ms
moodle-logo.gif
422 ms
logo.png
399 ms
moodle-logo-footer.png
215 ms
appswitcher
410 ms
atlassian-icons.woff
634 ms
checkLicense
138 ms
configuration
233 ms
icons_module.png
550 ms
bug.gif
316 ms
improvement.gif
636 ms
home.png
638 ms
search.png
646 ms
tools_20.png
707 ms
dashboard-diagnostics
636 ms
com.spartez.jira.plugins.commenttemplates-key
864 ms
uYKcPVoh6c5R0NpdEY5A-Q.woff
86 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
108 ms
ifr
789 ms
isAppSuggestionAvailable
492 ms
auth-refresh.js
534 ms
batch.css
647 ms
jira.webresources:list-styles.css
386 ms
jira.webresources:inline-layer.css
398 ms
jira.webresources:dropdown.css
412 ms
batch.js
831 ms
jira.webresources:content-retrievers.js
794 ms
jira.webresources:inline-layer.js
880 ms
jira.webresources:list.js
607 ms
jira.webresources:dropdown.js
1030 ms
generate
402 ms
loading.gif
406 ms
tracker.moodle.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
tracker.moodle.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tracker.moodle.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tracker.moodle.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tracker.moodle.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tracker.moodle.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tracker Moodle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: