1.5 sec in total
312 ms
1.1 sec
98 ms
Click here to check amazing NamepediA content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about namepedia.org
Provides information about personal names: history, origin and meaning, frequency, regional distribution, translations and transliterations.
Visit namepedia.orgWe analyzed Namepedia.org page load time and found that the first response time was 312 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
namepedia.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
312 ms
94 ms
186 ms
190 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Namepedia.org, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Blueshoes.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (437 ms) belongs to the original domain Namepedia.org.
Page size can be reduced by 158.0 kB (71%)
224.0 kB
66.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Namepedia.org main page is 224.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 120.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, NamepediA needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 61% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 83.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Namepedia.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (71%)
34
10
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NamepediA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
namepedia.org
312 ms
default.css
94 ms
Bs_Misc.lib.js
186 ms
Bs_Cookie.lib.js
190 ms
LibCrossBrowser.js
191 ms
EventHandler.js
192 ms
en.js
192 ms
default.js
193 ms
menus.js
274 ms
ga.js
31 ms
shoe_grayOnWhite_blueDot_xxs.gif
275 ms
htmlBg.gif
95 ms
logo_name_database_en.jpg
97 ms
linkLeft.jpg
190 ms
linkRight.jpg
187 ms
linkLeftA1.jpg
99 ms
linkAbg1.jpg
98 ms
linkRightA1.jpg
186 ms
barBg1.jpg
193 ms
linkIt.gif
193 ms
printIt.gif
194 ms
sendIt.gif
277 ms
namepedia.gif
278 ms
delicious.gif
283 ms
digg.gif
284 ms
reddit.gif
285 ms
google.gif
286 ms
ajax-loader.gif
367 ms
spacer.gif
368 ms
downArrow.gif
376 ms
searchSelectedBg1.gif
355 ms
searchSelected1.gif
357 ms
name_search_bg.gif
357 ms
bgLanguage_selection.gif
437 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
namepedia.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
namepedia.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
namepedia.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Namepedia.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Namepedia.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
namepedia.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NamepediA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: