2 sec in total
178 ms
1.4 sec
455 ms
Click here to check amazing Nantucket Project content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nantucketproject.com
tnp(one) will take place on nantucket island on october 5-8, 2023.
Visit nantucketproject.comWe analyzed Nantucketproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
nantucketproject.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
42/100
10%
Value16.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value1,920 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value43.5 s
0/100
10%
178 ms
523 ms
18 ms
120 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Nantucketproject.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (523 ms) belongs to the original domain Nantucketproject.com.
Page size can be reduced by 342.8 kB (40%)
855.8 kB
513.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Nantucketproject.com main page is 855.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 383.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nantucket Project images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 158.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nantucketproject.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (58%)
24
10
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nantucket Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nantucketproject.com
178 ms
www.nantucketproject.com
523 ms
font-awesome.min.css
18 ms
video-js.css
120 ms
pure-min.css
165 ms
grids-responsive-min.css
128 ms
main.css
230 ms
jquery.toast.min.css
131 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
297 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
129 ms
video.js
294 ms
jquery.toast.min.js
139 ms
main.js
192 ms
video-specific.css
172 ms
GalaxiePolaris-Book.otf
178 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
5 ms
GalaxiePolaris-Bold.otf
178 ms
sdk.js
61 ms
widgets.js
92 ms
analytics.js
147 ms
video-poster.jpg
173 ms
ERGO-MARS.jpg
129 ms
BITCOIN.jpg
181 ms
CASEY.jpg
171 ms
Wurman.jpg
181 ms
vjs.woff
121 ms
90 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
47 ms
xd_arbiter.php
54 ms
collect
26 ms
nantucketproject.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
nantucketproject.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
nantucketproject.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nantucketproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nantucketproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nantucketproject.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nantucket Project. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: