3.3 sec in total
374 ms
2.6 sec
306 ms
Visit netjumps.com now to see the best up-to-date Netjumps content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about netjumps.com
Skill transfer into call centers to building out call tracking metrics, print, web, digital, call tracking metrics, sales force integration as well as conversion rate Optimizations.
Visit netjumps.comWe analyzed Netjumps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 374 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
netjumps.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.724
6/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
374 ms
59 ms
70 ms
75 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Netjumps.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Netjumps.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (60%)
3.4 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Netjumps.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Netjumps images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 592.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Netjumps.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 592.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (71%)
68
20
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Netjumps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
netjumps.com
374 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
59 ms
css
70 ms
css
75 ms
styles.css
63 ms
blueimp-gallery.min.css
59 ms
jquery.fileupload.css
62 ms
rgs.css
61 ms
font-awesome.min.css
64 ms
style.css
143 ms
responsive.css
112 ms
js_composer.css
89 ms
jquery.js
126 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
94 ms
modernizr.js
94 ms
core.min.js
126 ms
widget.min.js
127 ms
position.min.js
128 ms
menu.min.js
273 ms
autocomplete.min.js
273 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
274 ms
jquery.form.min.js
275 ms
scripts.js
276 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
280 ms
tmpl.min.js
275 ms
load-image.all.min.js
276 ms
canvas-to-blob.min.js
277 ms
jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js
277 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.js
278 ms
jquery.fileupload.js
279 ms
jquery.fileupload-process.js
280 ms
jquery.fileupload-image.js
280 ms
jquery.fileupload-audio.js
281 ms
jquery.fileupload-video.js
1039 ms
jquery.fileupload-validate.js
1038 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui.js
1037 ms
jquery.fileupload-jquery-ui.js
1036 ms
respond.js
1037 ms
nicescroll.js
1068 ms
sticky.js
1013 ms
prettyPhoto.js
1015 ms
isotope.min.js
1037 ms
superfish.js
1011 ms
init.js
1126 ms
nectar-slider.js
1087 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1019 ms
js_composer_front.js
1020 ms
ga.js
87 ms
analytics.js
77 ms
clientlogos.jpg
936 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-21-at-1.56.59-PM.png
902 ms
smallbiztechnology-logo-.jpg
903 ms
images.png
906 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-21-at-2.07.12-PM.png
959 ms
usatoday.jpg
931 ms
i.js
51 ms
4fd49b06d9574f0b541aa455c563cb465cef9d88.1.js
121 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-21-at-2.14.10-PM.png
1229 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-21-at-2.12.15-PM.png
907 ms
download-1.png
912 ms
inc5000.jpg
1203 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1193 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
71 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1193 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
71 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
1193 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
1213 ms
Lovelo_Black.woff
1212 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1214 ms
icomoon.woff
1969 ms
__utm.gif
46 ms
collect
28 ms
collect
8 ms
[object%20Object]
252 ms
diagonal_line.png
69 ms
netjumps2.jpg
212 ms
grid.png
69 ms
nectar-loading.gif
69 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
85 ms
netjumps.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
netjumps.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
netjumps.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Netjumps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Netjumps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
netjumps.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Netjumps. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: