2 sec in total
241 ms
1.6 sec
172 ms
Visit nospammer.net now to see the best up-to-date Nospammer content for Guatemala and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nospammer.net
Visit nospammer.netWe analyzed Nospammer.net page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
nospammer.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value29.3 s
0/100
10%
Value30.9 s
0/100
25%
Value29.3 s
0/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value30.5 s
0/100
10%
241 ms
155 ms
69 ms
137 ms
12 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nospammer.net, 94% (49 requests) were made to Fortiguard.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Fortiguard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 725.8 kB (64%)
1.1 MB
406.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Nospammer.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 736.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nospammer needs image optimization as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 546.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 546.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nospammer.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (49%)
49
25
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nospammer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nospammer.net
241 ms
www.fortiguard.com
155 ms
stylesheet.css
69 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
137 ms
jquery-ui.css
12 ms
global.css
202 ms
bootstrap.labels.css
139 ms
jquery.min.js
340 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
547 ms
d3.v2.js
1072 ms
jsplus.js
205 ms
jquery.qtip2.min.js
268 ms
cookie.js
265 ms
staticscroll.js
267 ms
jquery.xml2json.js
332 ms
jquery.soap.js
399 ms
global.js
332 ms
bing.js
399 ms
charts.js
400 ms
graphdrawer.js
404 ms
dashboard.js
466 ms
global2.js
465 ms
pagegradient.png
270 ms
piwik.js
345 ms
logo.png
68 ms
search.png
71 ms
navgradient1.png
69 ms
navgradient2.png
71 ms
encyclopedia_background.png
428 ms
books.png
134 ms
threat_background.png
268 ms
lighthouse.png
136 ms
tools_small.png
140 ms
antivirus.png
200 ms
intrusionprevention.png
203 ms
appcontrol.png
208 ms
webfiltering.png
275 ms
antispam.png
273 ms
vulmanagement.png
276 ms
databasesecurity.png
340 ms
firewall.png
342 ms
redarrow1.png
328 ms
redarrow2.png
329 ms
redarrow3.png
388 ms
redarrow4.png
393 ms
redarrow5.png
392 ms
CartoGothicStd-Book-webfont.woff
395 ms
footer.png
462 ms
rss.png
449 ms
twitter.png
451 ms
facebook.png
524 ms
external.png
68 ms
nospammer.net accessibility score
nospammer.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
nospammer.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nospammer.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nospammer.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nospammer.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nospammer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: