Tools & Wizards About Us
notarkosten.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

notarkosten.org

Notarkosten (2023) für notarielle Beglaubigungen | Übersicht

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

328 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

652 ms

notarkosten.org screenshot

About Website

Visit notarkosten.org now to see the best up-to-date Notarkosten content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about notarkosten.org

Aktuelle Notarkosten (2020) für notarielle Beglaubigungen auf einen Blick ➥Adoption, Scheidung, Ehevertrag, Erbvertrag und weiteren Notar-Dienstleistungen.

Visit notarkosten.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Notarkosten.org page load time and found that the first response time was 328 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

notarkosten.org performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value37,900 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value48.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

notarkosten.org

328 ms

www.notargebuehren.com

589 ms

autoptimize_5fed0a820cb356b9fe0544f2f29f7381.css

288 ms

dashicons.min.css

569 ms

adsbygoogle.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Notarkosten.org, 39% (7 requests) were made to Notargebuehren.com and 28% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (798 ms) relates to the external source Notargebuehren.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.8 kB (17%)

Content Size

202.4 kB

After Optimization

168.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Notarkosten.org main page is 202.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 73.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 39.0 kB
  • After minification 38.9 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 23.6 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Notarkosten needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 66.5 kB
  • After minification 66.5 kB
  • After compression 66.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 73.3 kB
  • After minification 73.3 kB
  • After compression 72.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Notarkosten.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (36%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Notarkosten. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

notarkosten.org

notarkosten.org

328 ms

www.notargebuehren.com

www.notargebuehren.com

589 ms

autoptimize_5fed0a820cb356b9fe0544f2f29f7381.css

autoptimize_5fed0a820cb356b9fe0544f2f29f7381.css

288 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

569 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

60 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

548 ms

autoptimize_d2a9cb7cf7ea845966753d6b9e112e0a.js

autoptimize_d2a9cb7cf7ea845966753d6b9e112e0a.js

798 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

129 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

300 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

323 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

334 ms

ads

ads

411 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

66 ms

generatepress.woff

generatepress.woff

173 ms

ads

ads

361 ms

ads

ads

233 ms

ads

ads

434 ms

Notarkosten.png

Notarkosten.png

215 ms

Accessibility Review

notarkosten.org accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

notarkosten.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

notarkosten.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Notarkosten.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Notarkosten.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

notarkosten.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Notarkosten. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: