Tools & Wizards About Us
ntrf.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

ntrf.org

NTRF Small Churches, Big Impact | Making Disciples

Page Load Speed

766 ms in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

499 ms

Page Rendered

235 ms

ntrf.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing NTRF content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ntrf.org

Small Churches, BIG Disciple-Making Impact—A fellowship of bi-vocational pastors with 100+ years of combined, global experience.

Visit ntrf.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ntrf.org page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 734 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ntrf.org performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,380 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ntrf.org

32 ms

www.ntrf.org

84 ms

minmax.js

4 ms

simple.css

4 ms

screen.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Ntrf.org, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (115 ms) relates to the external source Navertise.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 54.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

227.0 kB

After Optimization

172.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ntrf.org main page is 227.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 141.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 28.8 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 141.9 kB
  • After minification 140.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NTRF images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 25.7 kB

  • Original 30.7 kB
  • After minification 17.9 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ntrf.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (36%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NTRF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ntrf.org

ntrf.org

32 ms

www.ntrf.org

www.ntrf.org

84 ms

minmax.js

minmax.js

4 ms

simple.css

simple.css

4 ms

screen.css

screen.css

32 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

31 ms

bug-ekklesia.jpg

bug-ekklesia.jpg

33 ms

layout-screen.css

layout-screen.css

14 ms

content.css

content.css

14 ms

all.js

all.js

66 ms

site_design_by_navigation.gif

site_design_by_navigation.gif

115 ms

ga.js

ga.js

83 ms

bkgd-tile.png

bkgd-tile.png

58 ms

bkgd.png

bkgd.png

59 ms

bkgd-page.png

bkgd-page.png

58 ms

bkgd-main.png

bkgd-main.png

58 ms

banner-home.jpg

banner-home.jpg

58 ms

bkgd-pagetop.png

bkgd-pagetop.png

58 ms

FindUsOnFacebook.gif

FindUsOnFacebook.gif

112 ms

ntrflink.jpg

ntrflink.jpg

114 ms

icon-printer.gif

icon-printer.gif

113 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

23 ms

93 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

26 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

29 ms

like.php

like.php

102 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

12 ms

Accessibility Review

ntrf.org accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ntrf.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ntrf.org SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ntrf.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ntrf.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ntrf.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NTRF. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: