Comments on: Does Target Settlement Really Hit the Target?

By: pink chi hair straightener

pink chi hair straightener — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:42:34 +0000

is exactly right. I like your srticle and I would like very much to read some more information on this issue. Will you post some more? chi pink flat irons

By: keber

keber — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:39:28 +0000

what’s ? baidu

By: milton artis

milton artis — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:04:24 +0000

what’s the status

By: Kevin

Kevin — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:35:08 +0000

I think your last paragraph is important. I think simply pointing to the fact that a lawsuit was brought against a national institution — and they lost — is critical. This, usually combined with the fact that Section 508 is required for US government sites and their contractors, is enough to stop people from whining.

By: Dennis at Web Axe

Dennis at Web Axe — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:08:49 +0000

Target gives away $3 million every week?! That stat sure puts a damper on the results of the settlement. There’s a lot to be interpreted from this lawsuit, but at minimum it points out that companies must pay more attention to the way their web sites are coded.

By: Bob Easton

Bob Easton — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:24:59 +0000

“And perhaps that’s all we need for the time being? ” is exactly right!

It’s a very good thing that Target did not have to admit wrong doing. That would have settled the question of whether the ADA applies. Extending the ADA by judicial activism is not the best way to get the desired results. Changing, or modernizing the law is.

I’ve written more about this at: http://www.access-matters.com/2008/08/29/target-lawsuit-settled-exactly-as-it-should-be/