<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So near to the finish line &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accessify.com/news/2008/11/wcag2-proposed-recommendation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accessify.com/news/2008/11/wcag2-proposed-recommendation/</link>
	<description>Accessibility news: WCAG, WAI, PAS 78 ... and all manner of other weird acronyms and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://accessify.com/news/2008/11/wcag2-proposed-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-85074</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 03:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessify.com/news/2008/11/wcag2-proposed-recommendation/#comment-85074</guid>
		<description>After a long and hard journey, it&#039;ll will be great to have the final WCAG 2.0 publication! This a a huge step for web accessibility, and congrats to everyone involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a long and hard journey, it&#8217;ll will be great to have the final WCAG 2.0 publication! This a a huge step for web accessibility, and congrats to everyone involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://accessify.com/news/2008/11/wcag2-proposed-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-84589</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessify.com/news/2008/11/wcag2-proposed-recommendation/#comment-84589</guid>
		<description>Thanks for spreading the news, Ian. You&#039;re right that this review of WCAG 2.0 itself is mainly for W3C Membership endorsement. 

As always, we welcome comments and suggestions for the supporting documents, including the Techniques for WCAG 2.0, Understanding WCAG 2.0, the Overview pages, etc. We also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/TECHS-SUBMIT/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;welcome submission of Techniques&lt;/a&gt;. A few more thoughts are in the blog post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/11/with_real_world_implementation.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;With real world implementations WCAG 2.0 steps closer to expected December 2008 publication&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for spreading the news, Ian. You&#8217;re right that this review of WCAG 2.0 itself is mainly for W3C Membership endorsement. </p>
<p>As always, we welcome comments and suggestions for the supporting documents, including the Techniques for WCAG 2.0, Understanding WCAG 2.0, the Overview pages, etc. We also <a href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/TECHS-SUBMIT/" rel="nofollow">welcome submission of Techniques</a>. A few more thoughts are in the blog post <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/11/with_real_world_implementation.html" rel="nofollow">With real world implementations WCAG 2.0 steps closer to expected December 2008 publication</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
