Tools & Wizards About Us
onelittleduck.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

onelittleduck.co.uk

Jason Dale Photography - South Wales Sports Photography

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

424 ms

onelittleduck.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to onelittleduck.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Onelittleduck best content right away, or after learning these important things about onelittleduck.co.uk

Photography gallery and blog featuring sports photography, football, wildlife. Also local images of South Wales, lego photography & landscapes

Visit onelittleduck.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Onelittleduck.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onelittleduck.co.uk performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.133

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.onelittleduck.co.uk

1812 ms

jquery.lightbox-0.5.css

249 ms

galleria.classic.css

250 ms

slickr-flickr.css

250 ms

css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Onelittleduck.co.uk, 17% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Onelittleduck.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 901.5 kB (40%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onelittleduck.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 35.8 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 135.1 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onelittleduck images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 355.5 kB

  • Original 450.5 kB
  • After minification 322.7 kB
  • After compression 95.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 355.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 382.9 kB

  • Original 432.9 kB
  • After minification 384.1 kB
  • After compression 49.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onelittleduck.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 382.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (65%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onelittleduck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.onelittleduck.co.uk

www.onelittleduck.co.uk

1812 ms

jquery.lightbox-0.5.css

jquery.lightbox-0.5.css

249 ms

galleria.classic.css

galleria.classic.css

250 ms

slickr-flickr.css

slickr-flickr.css

250 ms

css

css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

657 ms

css

css

15 ms

css

css

23 ms

style.css

style.css

843 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

498 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

254 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

589 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

262 ms

jquery.lightbox-0.5.js

jquery.lightbox-0.5.js

257 ms

galleria-1.2.3.min.js

galleria-1.2.3.min.js

267 ms

galleria.classic.js

galleria.classic.js

342 ms

slickr-flickr.js

slickr-flickr.js

354 ms

ouibounce.js

ouibounce.js

415 ms

custom.js

custom.js

501 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

433 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

499 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

498 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

588 ms

custom.js

custom.js

818 ms

imagesloaded.js

imagesloaded.js

661 ms

masonry.js

masonry.js

666 ms

jquery.hashchange.js

jquery.hashchange.js

584 ms

logo.png

logo.png

101 ms

5653366368_ae720ff3c2_b1-e1403087524289.jpg

5653366368_ae720ff3c2_b1-e1403087524289.jpg

337 ms

1512207_675669512472083_1434555141_o-400x250.jpg

1512207_675669512472083_1434555141_o-400x250.jpg

187 ms

10176194_10152443957520460_3801251394769722051_n-400x250.jpg

10176194_10152443957520460_3801251394769722051_n-400x250.jpg

105 ms

415698_10151228527075460_327321323_o-400x250.jpg

415698_10151228527075460_327321323_o-400x250.jpg

102 ms

155559338.Z2SOmZGO.20.CanoeSlalom-400x250.jpg

155559338.Z2SOmZGO.20.CanoeSlalom-400x250.jpg

103 ms

01-l.jpg

01-l.jpg

412 ms

05-l.jpg

05-l.jpg

425 ms

Untitled1.png

Untitled1.png

624 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

42 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

114 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

116 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

116 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

114 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

117 ms

s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

112 ms

EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

115 ms

ETmodules.ttf

ETmodules.ttf

220 ms

ETmonarch.ttf

ETmonarch.ttf

162 ms

Accessibility Review

onelittleduck.co.uk accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

onelittleduck.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

onelittleduck.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onelittleduck.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onelittleduck.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onelittleduck.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onelittleduck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: