Tools & Wizards About Us
onona.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

onona.com

** www.onona.com **

Page Load Speed

836 ms in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

575 ms

Page Rendered

88 ms

onona.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Onona content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onona.com

Visit onona.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onona.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 663 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onona.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

onona.com

173 ms

48 ms

113 ms

Dashboard

28 ms

Dashboard

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Onona.com, 57% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Admin.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (173 ms) belongs to the original domain Onona.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 138 B (40%)

Content Size

345 B

After Optimization

207 B

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Onona.com main page is 345 B. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 345 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 138 B

  • Original 345 B
  • After minification 298 B
  • After compression 207 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138 B or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • AJAX

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onona. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

onona.com

onona.com

173 ms

48 ms

113 ms

Dashboard

Dashboard

28 ms

Dashboard

Dashboard

138 ms

ServiceLogin

ServiceLogin

17 ms

ServiceLogin

ServiceLogin

52 ms

Accessibility Review

onona.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

onona.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

onona.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onona.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Onona.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onona.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onona. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: