1.1 sec in total
148 ms
717 ms
208 ms
Click here to check amazing Opal content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about opal.in
Visit opal.inWe analyzed Opal.in page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 925 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
opal.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.158
74/100
15%
Value17.1 s
5/100
10%
148 ms
96 ms
94 ms
39 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Opal.in, 23% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Webmasterindia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (432 ms) relates to the external source Webmasterindia.com.
Page size can be reduced by 362.9 kB (62%)
587.4 kB
224.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Opal.in main page is 587.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 397.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Opal needs image optimization as it can save up to 207.2 kB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 26.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Opal.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (27%)
30
22
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Opal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
opal.in
148 ms
bootstrap.min.css
96 ms
style.css
94 ms
css
39 ms
css
54 ms
css
61 ms
css
64 ms
jquery.min.js
84 ms
bootstrap.min.js
114 ms
DBImage.ashx
171 ms
Bulgaria.png
403 ms
logo.png
90 ms
google.jpg
251 ms
24icon.png
48 ms
indian-flag.png
88 ms
usa-flag.png
86 ms
europe.png
88 ms
alibaba-minisite-design.jpg
247 ms
fb.png
162 ms
twitter.png
163 ms
g+.png
162 ms
in.png
164 ms
blog.png
195 ms
you-tube.png
194 ms
China.png
413 ms
canada.jpg
414 ms
India.png
416 ms
India.png
416 ms
Greece.png
432 ms
livechatjs.ashx
200 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
8 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
12 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
12 ms
NbE6ykYuM2IyEwxQxOIi2H06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
26 ms
NbE6ykYuM2IyEwxQxOIi2FFZMcfX2SbzQ69I7OWmkGo.ttf
25 ms
46aYWdgz-1oFX11flmyEfYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
25 ms
NbE6ykYuM2IyEwxQxOIi2AV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf
28 ms
etsUjZYO8lTLU85lDhZwUm-gXUWvikdRm39El-Kldqo.ttf
28 ms
livechat.ashx
87 ms
opal.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
opal.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
opal.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opal.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Opal.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
opal.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Opal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: