5.4 sec in total
517 ms
4.2 sec
613 ms
Visit operant.in now to see the best up-to-date Operant content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about operant.in
Video Conferencing Solutions, Epabx Solutions, Business telephones, IP Telephony & IP phones system – Operant provides all types of business telephone system, voip phones, video conferencing system, i...
Visit operant.inWe analyzed Operant.in page load time and found that the first response time was 517 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
operant.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value21.5 s
0/100
10%
Value20,910 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value35.5 s
0/100
10%
517 ms
154 ms
271 ms
478 ms
733 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Operant.in, 11% (12 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 9% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Operant.in.
Page size can be reduced by 503.2 kB (33%)
1.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Operant.in main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 828.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Operant images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 360.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Operant.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 360.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (36%)
87
56
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Operant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
operant.in
517 ms
css
154 ms
ionicons.min.css
271 ms
bootstrap.min.css
478 ms
app.css
733 ms
menu.css
469 ms
jquery-latest.js
125 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
506 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
504 ms
jquery-2.2.4.min.js
507 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
709 ms
jquery.pace.min.js
709 ms
slick.min.js
969 ms
masonry.min.js
967 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
974 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1112 ms
js
175 ms
app.js
1112 ms
conversion.js
126 ms
popup.js
1110 ms
chatinline.aspx
236 ms
livechat2.aspx
234 ms
analytics.js
233 ms
BgSeR8ADVvk
291 ms
site-logo.png
494 ms
but1.jpg
492 ms
but2.jpg
493 ms
but3.jpg
494 ms
but4.jpg
491 ms
but5.jpg
494 ms
slider-img.jpg
1550 ms
logo-bg.jpg
704 ms
why1.png
682 ms
why2.png
680 ms
why3.png
680 ms
why4.png
712 ms
why5.png
1206 ms
why6.png
1209 ms
why9.png
1209 ms
why10.png
1208 ms
why7.png
1423 ms
why8.png
1423 ms
why11.png
1423 ms
fun-facts.jpg
1423 ms
icon-14.png
1421 ms
icon-14-hover.png
1546 ms
icon-17.png
1545 ms
icon-17-1.png
1545 ms
icon-19.png
1544 ms
icon-19-1.png
1544 ms
icon-18.png
1810 ms
icon-18-hover.png
1801 ms
icon-p1.png
1813 ms
icon-p1-hover.png
1730 ms
icon-p2.png
1728 ms
icon-p2-hover.png
1723 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
328 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
352 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
458 ms
serv-img.jpg
1994 ms
collect
389 ms
serv-img4.jpg
1908 ms
serv-img3.jpg
1915 ms
www-player.css
112 ms
www-embed-player.js
110 ms
base.js
110 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
110 ms
serv-img5.jpg
1914 ms
gen_204
281 ms
BgSeR8ADVvk
1 ms
BgSeR8ADVvk
325 ms
ionicons.ttf
1992 ms
icon-1.png
1664 ms
icon-2.png
1807 ms
icon-3.png
1814 ms
icon-4.png
1812 ms
icon-5.png
1805 ms
collect
176 ms
118 ms
www-player.css
136 ms
www-embed-player.js
185 ms
base.js
227 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
104 ms
icon-6.png
1631 ms
icon-7.png
1799 ms
icon-8.png
1778 ms
enquire.png
1771 ms
css
24 ms
chatinline.css
49 ms
resources2.aspx
472 ms
footer-bg.jpg
2017 ms
690 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
398 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
396 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
440 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
436 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
399 ms
ad_status.js
394 ms
undefined
1338 ms
7f2HzU_eRiWxv--cAX3t_q7u4Wt7MOcmPwwdepX4QRg.js
261 ms
embed.js
188 ms
livechatinit2.js
99 ms
id
98 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
35 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
336 ms
Create
408 ms
operant.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
operant.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
operant.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Operant.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Operant.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
operant.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Operant. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: