4.8 sec in total
540 ms
4 sec
197 ms
Welcome to option.ru homepage info - get ready to check Option best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about option.ru
Инвестиционно-Финансовая компания «Опцион» — доверительное управление на рынке опционов и фьючерсов.
Visit option.ruWe analyzed Option.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 540 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
option.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
540 ms
719 ms
398 ms
280 ms
701 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Option.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Option.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 303.7 kB (64%)
471.1 kB
167.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Option.ru main page is 471.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 326.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 761 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Option images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 236.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 236.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Option.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (70%)
54
16
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Option. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
option.ru
540 ms
www.option.ru
719 ms
styles.css
398 ms
services.css
280 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.5.custom.css
701 ms
datechooser.css
281 ms
select-free.css
285 ms
date-functions.js
804 ms
datechooser.js
597 ms
jquery.js
1187 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1612 ms
jquery.dimensions.js
531 ms
scripts.js
798 ms
watch.js
1 ms
urchin.js
9 ms
js.php
615 ms
logo.gif
471 ms
button_enter.gif
153 ms
arrup.gif
381 ms
arrdn.gif
142 ms
arrow_right.gif
278 ms
close.gif
279 ms
pod.gif
280 ms
icon_email.gif
290 ms
icon_search.gif
415 ms
icon_sitemap.gif
418 ms
icon_favorite.gif
418 ms
icon_rss.gif
429 ms
main_teaser1.jpg
686 ms
main_teaser2.jpg
691 ms
main_teaser3.jpg
556 ms
__utm.gif
35 ms
inf_lla.gif
519 ms
selectb_bg.gif
531 ms
_inform_RTS.gif
573 ms
inf_ra.gif
659 ms
b_bg.gif
657 ms
_inform_GAZR.gif
669 ms
inf_m.gif
716 ms
_inform_LKOH.gif
780 ms
_inform_GOLD.gif
789 ms
_inform_SI.gif
795 ms
inf_rr_bg.gif
795 ms
inf_rr.gif
808 ms
inf_ll.gif
859 ms
inf_la.gif
950 ms
inf_rra.gif
955 ms
green-bg.gif
1097 ms
RTS.png
956 ms
GAZR.png
958 ms
LKOH.png
1002 ms
GOLD.png
1082 ms
SI.png
1094 ms
hit
258 ms
shapka.jpg
1141 ms
icon_blank.gif
994 ms
hit
128 ms
counter
339 ms
option.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
option.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
option.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
RU
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Option.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Option.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
option.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Option. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: