Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

option.ru

Инвестиционно-Финансовая компания «Опцион» — доверительное управление на рынке опционов и фьючерсов.

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

540 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

197 ms

option.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to option.ru homepage info - get ready to check Option best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about option.ru

Инвестиционно-Финансовая компания «Опцион» — доверительное управление на рынке опционов и фьючерсов.

Visit option.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Option.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 540 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

option.ru performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

option.ru

540 ms

www.option.ru

719 ms

styles.css

398 ms

services.css

280 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.5.custom.css

701 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Option.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Option.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 303.7 kB (64%)

Content Size

471.1 kB

After Optimization

167.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Option.ru main page is 471.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 326.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 32.7 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 761 B

  • Original 63.0 kB
  • After minification 62.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Option images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 236.5 kB

  • Original 326.4 kB
  • After minification 312.6 kB
  • After compression 89.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 236.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 36.4 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Option.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (70%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Option. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

option.ru accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

option.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

option.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Option.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Option.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Option. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: