7.3 sec in total
1.7 sec
3.3 sec
2.2 sec
Visit opulentus.net now to see the best up-to-date Opulentus content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about opulentus.net
Opulentus- the Visa Company has started functioning since 2001. We have the most exceptional immigration counselors who helped many of our clients to succeed in their visa and immigration process.
Visit opulentus.netWe analyzed Opulentus.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
opulentus.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value1,600 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
1726 ms
531 ms
528 ms
26 ms
810 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Opulentus.net, 39% (37 requests) were made to 1.gravatar.com and 33% (31 requests) were made to 0.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Opulentus.net.
Page size can be reduced by 606.5 kB (73%)
829.5 kB
223.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Opulentus.net main page is 829.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 394.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 655 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Opulentus images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 254.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 235.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Opulentus.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 235.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (17%)
90
75
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Opulentus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
opulentus.net
1726 ms
styles.css
531 ms
social_widget.css
528 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
810 ms
jquery.js
1421 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
606 ms
a
18 ms
jquery.form.min.js
526 ms
scripts.js
525 ms
comment-reply.min.js
539 ms
navigation.js
548 ms
images.jpg
410 ms
rss.png
535 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
245 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
249 ms
S5unec9Kvp8
257 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
156 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
154 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
152 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
150 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
152 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
253 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
253 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
145 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
132 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
242 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
245 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
245 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
244 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
246 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
243 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
241 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
242 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
243 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
241 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
237 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
234 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
236 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
235 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
235 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
231 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
232 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
232 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
232 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
234 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
236 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
236 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
229 ms
s.gif
68 ms
collect
49 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
183 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
190 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
185 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
185 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
188 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
190 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
184 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
189 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
268 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
185 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
262 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
179 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
179 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
256 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
259 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
258 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
254 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
257 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
251 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
257 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
260 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
32 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
143 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
243 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
249 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
247 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
241 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
246 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
246 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
245 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
238 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
237 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
209 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
209 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
125 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
174 ms
www-embed-player.js
195 ms
base.js
288 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
31 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
43 ms
ad_status.js
47 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
95 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
103 ms
opulentus.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
opulentus.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
opulentus.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opulentus.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Opulentus.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
opulentus.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Opulentus. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: