Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

packageprinting.com

Packaging Impressions - For Printers and Converters of Labels, Flexible Packaging and Folding Cartons

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

123 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

430 ms

packageprinting.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Packageprinting content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about packageprinting.com

For Printers and Converters of Labels, Flexible Packaging and Folding Cartons

Visit packageprinting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Packageprinting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

packageprinting.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,720 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.149

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

packageprinting.com

123 ms

www.packageprinting.com

198 ms

99d39.css

180 ms

napco-font.css

91 ms

napco-font.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 174 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Packageprinting.com, 13% (23 requests) were made to S0.2mdn.net and 8% (14 requests) were made to Network.napco.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (728 ms) relates to the external source W2.napco.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (35%)

Content Size

7.8 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Packageprinting.com main page is 7.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 123.9 kB

  • Original 149.0 kB
  • After minification 125.1 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 822.6 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 4.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Packageprinting needs image optimization as it can save up to 822.6 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB
  • After compression 773.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 310.4 kB

  • Original 381.1 kB
  • After minification 375.7 kB
  • After compression 70.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packageprinting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 310.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (42%)

Requests Now

154

After Optimization

90

The browser has sent 154 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packageprinting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

packageprinting.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

packageprinting.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

packageprinting.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packageprinting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Packageprinting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Packageprinting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: