25.6 sec in total
1.3 sec
22.2 sec
2.2 sec
Welcome to packaging52.com homepage info - get ready to check Packaging 52 best content right away, or after learning these important things about packaging52.com
Packaging Solution is one stop solution for all type of packaging needs including custom corrugated boxes, duplex boxes fully plain and printed.
Visit packaging52.comWe analyzed Packaging52.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 24.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
packaging52.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value1,750 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
1259 ms
2130 ms
1512 ms
1471 ms
2023 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Packaging52.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Packaging52.com.
Page size can be reduced by 980.6 kB (26%)
3.8 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Packaging52.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging 52 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 605.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 605.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packaging52.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (65%)
68
24
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging 52. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
packaging52.com
1259 ms
packaging52.com
2130 ms
style.css
1512 ms
fonts.css
1471 ms
font-awesome.css
2023 ms
shortcodes.css
2796 ms
responsive.css
2820 ms
settings.css
2068 ms
captions.css
2004 ms
prettyPhoto.css
2100 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
2763 ms
colorpicker.css
2771 ms
jquery.reject.css
2855 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
39 ms
jquery-migrate.js
2898 ms
jquery.validate.js
4164 ms
js
83 ms
jquery.reject.js
3477 ms
jquery.easing.js
3491 ms
jquery.cookie.js
3501 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
3535 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
3566 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
4200 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
4234 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
4241 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.min.js
4280 ms
superfish.js
4298 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.js
7113 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
6543 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
5017 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
5040 ms
jquery.elastislide.js
5104 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
5130 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
6639 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
5903 ms
_utils.js
5958 ms
_front.js
5975 ms
contact-form.js
6664 ms
comment-reply.js
6722 ms
js
84 ms
googlemap-init.js
6730 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
5715 ms
css
17 ms
fontello.css
5789 ms
_isotope.js
5278 ms
PS-Logo.png
916 ms
2-PS-Logo.png
503 ms
slide_0741351001457591375.jpg
5804 ms
slide_0993993001457591316.jpg
10520 ms
slide_0235572001457591222.jpg
8351 ms
0955523001457181115.jpg
902 ms
0576713001457181757.jpg
2291 ms
0103387001634646701.jpg
1496 ms
0782184001457181677.jpg
3260 ms
0398643001457181424.jpg
3271 ms
captcha.php
3357 ms
facebook.png
4330 ms
twitter.png
4331 ms
google-plus.png
4418 ms
bubble-down.png
5433 ms
analytics.js
37 ms
mZSs29ggGoaqrCNB3kDfZQ.woff
219 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf
35 ms
I5PmmDkYShUQg-ah7wh25w.woff
466 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf
36 ms
trnbTfqisuuhRVI3i45C5w.woff
416 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf
90 ms
fontellob701.woff
5386 ms
fontawesome-webfontba72.woff
5641 ms
collect
30 ms
bullets.png
6818 ms
gen_204
25 ms
timer.png
6652 ms
loader.gif
6864 ms
common.js
11 ms
util.js
9 ms
bullet.png
560 ms
large_left.png
565 ms
large_right.png
548 ms
packaging52.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
packaging52.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
packaging52.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packaging52.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Packaging52.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
packaging52.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging 52. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: